Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "idenfifi".
Did you mean:
identifi
2016 Mar 08
5
Module Versioning
On Mon, 7 Mar 2016, Pete Batard via Syslinux wrote:
> I could also say something about the ISOHybrid _HACK_, which clearly is not
> something that was ever intended by the people who designed ISO-9660, and
> that could "either work if you're lucky or fail if you're not". Looking at
> the recent history of this mailing list, it does seem to me like ISOHybrid
>
2016 Mar 08
0
Module Versioning
> On Mon, 7 Mar 2016, Pete Batard via Syslinux wrote:
> > I could also say something about the ISOHybrid _HACK_, which clearly is not
> > something that was ever intended by the people who designed ISO-9660, and
> > that could "either work if you're lucky or fail if you're not". Looking at
> > the recent history of this mailing list, it does seem to
2016 Mar 08
0
Module Versioning... and other things
With apologies to Ady, I think there are important points to be made
from this conversation, one which being the merging of ldlinux.sys and
isolinux.bin, which I would very much like to rally people on this list
into seeing as beneficial. So I will reply to this e-mail.
On 2016.03.08 03:10, BALATON Zoltan via Syslinux wrote:
> The difference is that the
> headache in this case is for
2016 Mar 07
2
Module Versioning
On Mon, 7 Mar 2016, Pete Batard via Syslinux wrote:
> On 2016.03.07 17:55, Ferenc W?gner wrote:
>> Why not install instead an arbitrary version of Syslinux and replace all
>> .c32 files with the modules of the installed version?
>
> I mentioned that in my previous mail. But I reckon it was easy to miss
> as that mail was rather long:
>
>
> "One solution to