search for: idealogically

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "idealogically".

Did you mean: idealogical
2003 Aug 14
2
Hardware encoder.
Hi people, I am aware of the integer based DEcoder (Tremor) but am more interested in a hardware ENcoder, for use in a solid state portable recorder. Has anyone made *any* steps towards implementing an encoder in a DSP? I ask because I have been investigating MP3 hardware encoders, and apart from being very expensive (to licence - DSPs are as cheap as grains of sand in comparison) I have an
2004 Oct 18
0
win98 and domain logins, Can't browse network
...d I'd like it to 'work properly' for aesthetic reasons. I don't mind having to rejig the PCs to just use workgroups rather than domain logins, if that's a 'better' way to do a pretty simple network. I was trying to reproduce the NT setup on the Sambe server, but am not idealogically committed to it. Can anyone make a suggestion for how to go about this? I'm no samba wiz, I've cobbled the config above from various howtos that seemed pretty close to what I wanted to achieve, but I've made mistakes, I'm sure! thanks! Carl
2005 Mar 31
4
Transactions
...if the transaction committed or rolled back? If it rolled back id obviously want to throw them back, whereas if it committed id want to show a completion page. Something along the following lines: unless @???.committed? render_action ''somewhere'' end Is this how its done (idealogically) or am I on the wrong track? If anyone can give me an example of doing what Im attempting id really appreciate it! Thanks.
2007 Jul 10
4
type III ANOVA for a nested linear model
Hello, is it possible to obtain type III sums of squares for a nested model as in the following: lmod <- lm(resp ~ A * B + (C %in% A), mydata)) I have tried library(car) Anova(lmod, type="III") but this gives me an error (and I also understand from the documentation of Anova as well as from a previous request (http://finzi.psych.upenn.edu/R/Rhelp02a/archive/64477.html) that it is
2007 Dec 06
43
Mocks? Really?
OK, so i''ve played a bit with mocks and mock_models in controller and view tests and i have a question. Is this statement really correct: "We highly recommend that you exploit the mock framework here rather than providing real model objects in order to keep the view specs isolated from changes to your models." (http://rspec.rubyforge.org/documentation/rails/writing/views.html