Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "idealogically".
Did you mean:
idealogical
2003 Aug 14
2
Hardware encoder.
Hi people,
I am aware of the integer based DEcoder (Tremor) but am more interested in a hardware ENcoder, for use in a solid state portable recorder.
Has anyone made *any* steps towards implementing an encoder in a DSP?
I ask because I have been investigating MP3 hardware encoders, and apart from being very expensive (to licence - DSPs are as cheap as grains of sand in comparison) I have an
2004 Oct 18
0
win98 and domain logins, Can't browse network
...d I'd like it to 'work properly' for aesthetic
reasons.
I don't mind having to rejig the PCs to just use workgroups rather
than domain logins, if that's a 'better' way to do a pretty simple
network. I was trying to reproduce the NT setup on the Sambe
server, but am not idealogically committed to it. Can anyone make a
suggestion for how to go about this? I'm no samba wiz, I've cobbled
the config above from various howtos that seemed pretty close to
what I wanted to achieve, but I've made mistakes, I'm sure!
thanks!
Carl
2005 Mar 31
4
Transactions
...if the transaction committed
or rolled back? If it rolled back id obviously want to throw them back,
whereas if it committed id want to show a completion page. Something
along the following lines:
unless @???.committed?
render_action ''somewhere''
end
Is this how its done (idealogically) or am I on the wrong track? If
anyone can give me an example of doing what Im attempting id really
appreciate it! Thanks.
2007 Jul 10
4
type III ANOVA for a nested linear model
Hello,
is it possible to obtain type III sums of squares for a nested model as
in the following:
lmod <- lm(resp ~ A * B + (C %in% A), mydata))
I have tried
library(car)
Anova(lmod, type="III")
but this gives me an error (and I also understand from the documentation
of Anova as well as from a previous request
(http://finzi.psych.upenn.edu/R/Rhelp02a/archive/64477.html) that it is
2007 Dec 06
43
Mocks? Really?
OK, so i''ve played a bit with mocks and mock_models in controller and
view tests and i have a question. Is this statement really correct:
"We highly recommend that you exploit the mock framework here rather
than providing real model objects in order to keep the view specs
isolated from changes to your models."
(http://rspec.rubyforge.org/documentation/rails/writing/views.html