Displaying 20 results from an estimated 432 matches for "idas".
Did you mean:
ida
2003 Sep 01
1
Apparent problem with ida(4); patch included
Someone else also reported seeing these symptoms with recently-updated
sources:
>>> Kernel build for FREEBEAST started on Mon Sep 1 05:25:41 PDT 2003
...
===> ida
@ -> /usr/src/sys
machine -> /usr/src/sys/i386/include
perl @/kern/makeops.pl -h @/kern/device_if.m
perl @/kern/makeops.pl -h @/kern/bus_if.m
perl @/kern/makeops.pl -h @/pci/pci_if.m
rm -f .depend
mkdep -f .depend -a
2005 Jun 22
1
Newbie - Encoding PCM
Hi all,
i've to encode voice from a voicemodem. I choose speex 1.0.5 for its quality
in voice encoding. I've tried to implement an encoder but unsuccesfully.
Here's my code:
/* ============ SPEEX stream ENCODER
============================================ */
int SPEEX_EncodePCM(struct _IDA_ClientSocket *IDA,char *buffer,unsigned char
*PCM,int num_samples) {
/* buffer point to the
2003 Sep 01
1
source broken ?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I've just cvsupped my RELENG_4 tree this morning, and this is what I get when I
do make depend after I configure my kernel:
mkdep -f .depend -a -nostdinc -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -I- -I. -I@
- -I@/../include -I/usr/include /usr/src/sys/modules/ida/../../dev/ida/ida.c
/usr/src/sys/modules/ida/../../dev/ida/ida_disk.c
2013 Aug 28
2
[PATCH] percpu ida: Switch to cpumask_t, add some comments
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 12:55:17 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote:
> Fixup patch, addressing Andrew's review feedback:
Looks reasonable.
> lib/idr.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
I still don't think it should be in this file.
You say that some as-yet-unmerged patches will tie the new code into
the old ida code. But will it do it in a
2013 Aug 28
2
[PATCH] percpu ida: Switch to cpumask_t, add some comments
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 12:55:17 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote:
> Fixup patch, addressing Andrew's review feedback:
Looks reasonable.
> lib/idr.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
I still don't think it should be in this file.
You say that some as-yet-unmerged patches will tie the new code into
the old ida code. But will it do it in a
2013 Aug 28
2
[PATCH] percpu ida: Switch to cpumask_t, add some comments
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:00:10 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 01:25:50PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 12:55:17 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Fixup patch, addressing Andrew's review feedback:
> >
> > Looks reasonable.
> >
> > >
2013 Aug 28
2
[PATCH] percpu ida: Switch to cpumask_t, add some comments
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:00:10 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 01:25:50PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 12:55:17 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Fixup patch, addressing Andrew's review feedback:
> >
> > Looks reasonable.
> >
> > >
2015 Sep 17
7
[PATCH 0/2] Fix memory leaks in virtio & remoteproc cores
Hi,
The following patches fix couple of memory leaks in the virtio and
remoteproc cores when using these as modules, and going through a
cycle of insmod and rmmod with at least a device registered with
the corresponding cores in between. I ran into this on our downstream
product kernels on both 3.14 and 4.1 based kernels, and should apply
to the latest kernel as well.
Patches can be picked up
2015 Sep 17
7
[PATCH 0/2] Fix memory leaks in virtio & remoteproc cores
Hi,
The following patches fix couple of memory leaks in the virtio and
remoteproc cores when using these as modules, and going through a
cycle of insmod and rmmod with at least a device registered with
the corresponding cores in between. I ran into this on our downstream
product kernels on both 3.14 and 4.1 based kernels, and should apply
to the latest kernel as well.
Patches can be picked up
2008 Feb 14
4
Problem with p2v - device /dev/ida/c0d0p2
Hello,
I''m doing one emergencial migrate for one very old machine, because we
will have one IMPLOSION (!!!) very close from here, and I''m thinking
that this old IDE disk will not survive... :-/
[root@registro-2 /root]# df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/ida/c0d0p2 3.8G 2.3G 1.4G 62% /
/dev/ida/c0d0p8 26G 20G 4.4G 82% /data
2013 Aug 28
0
[PATCH] percpu ida: Switch to cpumask_t, add some comments
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 02:10:19PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:00:10 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 01:25:50PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 12:55:17 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Fixup patch, addressing
2015 Sep 17
2
DEFINE_IDA causing memory leaks? (was Re: [PATCH 1/2] virtio: fix memory leak of virtio ida cache layers)
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 07:29:17PM -0500, Suman Anna wrote:
> The virtio core uses a static ida named virtio_index_ida for
> assigning index numbers to virtio devices during registration.
> The ida core may allocate some internal idr cache layers and
> an ida bitmap upon any ida allocation, and all these layers are
> truely freed only upon the ida destruction. The virtio_index_ida
2015 Sep 17
2
DEFINE_IDA causing memory leaks? (was Re: [PATCH 1/2] virtio: fix memory leak of virtio ida cache layers)
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 07:29:17PM -0500, Suman Anna wrote:
> The virtio core uses a static ida named virtio_index_ida for
> assigning index numbers to virtio devices during registration.
> The ida core may allocate some internal idr cache layers and
> an ida bitmap upon any ida allocation, and all these layers are
> truely freed only upon the ida destruction. The virtio_index_ida
2013 Aug 28
0
[PATCH] percpu ida: Switch to cpumask_t, add some comments
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 01:25:50PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 12:55:17 -0700 Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> wrote:
>
> > Fixup patch, addressing Andrew's review feedback:
>
> Looks reasonable.
>
> > lib/idr.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>
> I still don't think it should be in this file.
2015 Sep 17
0
DEFINE_IDA causing memory leaks? (was Re: [PATCH 1/2] virtio: fix memory leak of virtio ida cache layers)
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 07:15:44AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 08:33 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 07:29:17PM -0500, Suman Anna wrote:
> > > The virtio core uses a static ida named virtio_index_ida for
> > > assigning index numbers to virtio devices during registration.
> > > The ida core may allocate some
2004 Jan 20
1
T400P / T100P with Hong Kong IDA-P Lines
2005 Jun 30
0
speex_encode segfault
Hi,
i'm following encoder example in the manual.pdf of speex documentation. Here's
my portion of code:
int SPEEX_EncodePCM(struct _IDA_ClientSocket *IDA,char *buffer,unsigned char
*PCM,int num_samples) {
int ret,c,d=0,nbBytes,ttBytes=0;
float PCM_F[160];
char cBits[200];
#ifndef DISABLESPEEX
speex_bits_reset(&IDA->speex_bits);
for(c=0;c<num_samples;c++) {
2005 Jul 03
0
speex_encode segfault
Hi,
i'm following encoder example in the manual.pdf of speex documentation. Here's
my portion of code:
int SPEEX_EncodePCM(struct _IDA_ClientSocket *IDA,char *buffer,unsigned char
*PCM,int num_samples) {
int ret,c,d=0,nbBytes,ttBytes=0;
float PCM_F[160];
char cBits[200];
#ifndef DISABLESPEEX
speex_bits_reset(&IDA->speex_bits);
for(c=0;c<num_samples;c++) {
2015 Sep 17
0
[PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: fix memory leak of remoteproc ida cache layers
The remoteproc core uses a static ida named rproc_dev_index for
assigning an automatic index number to a registered remoteproc.
The ida core may allocate some internal idr cache layers and ida
bitmap upon any ida allocation, and all these layers are truely
freed only upon the ida destruction. The rproc_dev_index ida is
not destroyed at present, leading to a memory leak when using the
remoteproc
2015 Sep 17
0
[PATCH 1/2] virtio: fix memory leak of virtio ida cache layers
The virtio core uses a static ida named virtio_index_ida for
assigning index numbers to virtio devices during registration.
The ida core may allocate some internal idr cache layers and
an ida bitmap upon any ida allocation, and all these layers are
truely freed only upon the ida destruction. The virtio_index_ida
is not destroyed at present, leading to a memory leak when using
the virtio core as a