Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "id2135".
Did you mean:
2135
2019 Jan 15
2
Cannot access other computers on LAN
Hello Julien,
Am Mon, 14 Jan 2019 22:15:47 +0100
schrieb Julien dupont <marcelvierzon at gmail.com>:
> ** Test 1 **
> On VPN_office I use 'tcpdump -npi any icmp and host 192.168.1.3'
> When pinging 192.168.1.1 from client 1, with no success, I see no packet
> passing.
Sorry - the tcpdump command should end with "192.168.1.1" instead of
2019 Jan 15
2
Cannot access other computers on LAN
Hello Julien,
Am Tue, 15 Jan 2019 09:30:23 +0100
schrieb Julien dupont <marcelvierzon at gmail.com>:
> In that case I see:
> IP 172.16.0.3 > 192.168.1.1: ICMP echo request, id2135, seq1, length 64
> IP 172.16.0.3 > 192.168.1.1: ICMP echo request, id2135, seq2, length 64
> IP 172.16.0.3 > 192.168.1.1: ICMP echo request, id2135, seq3, length 64
>
> Packet goes through but no PONG back if I understand correctly. That's
> probably where it goes wrong....
2019 Jan 15
0
Cannot access other computers on LAN
...>
> Sorry - the tcpdump command should end with "192.168.1.1" instead of
> "192.168.1.3".
> (everything following "any" is a filter for the interesting traffic)
>
>
Yes obviously.
In that case I see:
IP 172.16.0.3 > 192.168.1.1: ICMP echo request, id2135, seq1, length 64
IP 172.16.0.3 > 192.168.1.1: ICMP echo request, id2135, seq2, length 64
IP 172.16.0.3 > 192.168.1.1: ICMP echo request, id2135, seq3, length 64
Packet goes through but no PONG back if I understand correctly. That's
probably where it goes wrong.
>
> > When pin...
2019 Jan 15
0
Cannot access other computers on LAN
...anv. 2019 à 13:49, Lars Kruse <lists at sumpfralle.de> a écrit :
> Hello Julien,
>
>
> Am Tue, 15 Jan 2019 09:30:23 +0100
> schrieb Julien dupont <marcelvierzon at gmail.com>:
>
> > In that case I see:
> > IP 172.16.0.3 > 192.168.1.1: ICMP echo request, id2135, seq1, length 64
> > IP 172.16.0.3 > 192.168.1.1: ICMP echo request, id2135, seq2, length 64
> > IP 172.16.0.3 > 192.168.1.1: ICMP echo request, id2135, seq3, length 64
> >
> > Packet goes through but no PONG back if I understand correctly. That's
> > probabl...