search for: icses

On Sun, 10 May 2015, Rowland Penny wrote: > Have you really got 19 reverse zones for your samba 4 active directory ? Yep :-) > Can you try running 'samba-tool ldapcmp ldap://<YOUR_FIRST_DC> ldap://<YOUR_SECOND_DC> Interesting. DC1 and DC2 have many differences; DC1 and DC3 are the same. Maybe I will demote DC2 and join it again. > Check if you actually have dns

On 10/05/15 15:34, Steve Thompson wrote: > On Sun, 10 May 2015, Rowland Penny wrote: > >> Have you really got 19 reverse zones for your samba 4 active directory ? > > Yep :-) Why ? And why don't they show up when you ask for the zones with samba-tool ? > >> Can you try running 'samba-tool ldapcmp ldap://<YOUR_FIRST_DC> >>

Samba 4.0.0, CentOS 6.4, bind 9.9 DLZ. I could use some help debugging a strange DNS issue. I have two Samba4 domain controllers, dc-1.europa.icse.cornell.edu and dc-2.europa.icse.cornell.edu. On either dc-1 or dc-2 or any client host: # host dc-1.europa.icse.cornell.edu dc-2 dc-1.europa.icse.cornell.edu has address 192.168.15.250 dc-1.europa.icse.cornell.edu has address 192.168.3.250

On Sun, 10 May 2015, Rowland Penny wrote: > can you post your named conf files. Sure. This is samba's: dlz "AD DNS Zone" { database "dlopen /mnt/domain/samba/europa/lib/bind9/dlz_bind9_9.so"; }; and this is BIND's (notice the last line commented out): options { directory "/var/named"; dump-file "/var/named/data/cache_dump.db";

Samba 4.1.1 using BIND_DLZ (bind-9.9.1-0.1.P2) on CentOS 6.5 x86_64. I have two domain controllers, dc-1 and dc-2, which each have three network interfaces. Selinux is in permissive mode, and iptables is off. One interface on each dc is to be shut down. So, on dc-1, I do: # nsupdate -g update delete europa.icse.cornell.edu A 192.168.3.250 update delete europa.icse.cornell.edu A 192.168.3.251

Roland, Thank you very much for your attention to this. You should get a medal for all the help you give everyone on this list. On Sun, 10 May 2015, Rowland Penny wrote: > Why ? And why don't they show up when you ask for the zones with samba-tool ? I have that many subnets. As for why they don't show up: they are defined in BIND's configuration and not samba's; they never

On 10/05/15 16:08, Steve Thompson wrote: > Roland, > > Thank you very much for your attention to this. You should get a medal > for all the help you give everyone on this list. > > On Sun, 10 May 2015, Rowland Penny wrote: > >> Why ? And why don't they show up when you ask for the zones with >> samba-tool ? > > I have that many subnets. As for why they

HI I just wanted to know if anybody has successfully or attempted to install ices om Mac OsX ? I have tried over the last few days, but no success, it would be good to know firstly if it is compatible before I spew my term output here and cause un-necessary spam I have icecast-1.3.12 up and running with Shout, a fink (fink.sourceforge.net) port but I see from the home page this is not

John-- a couple questions: Can you explain the SAFECode model in a bit more detail? I am getting conflicting information. On one hand, some of the papers describe a system that is primarily designed to hide safety violations. On the other hand, the 2006 ICSE paper that I cited earlier today seems to be talking about catching violations. These are very different goals! What does the code

Hi, Can you add the following two publications from our group to the LLVM publications page. - *Alive-FP: Automated Verification of Floating Point Based Peephole Optimizations in LLVM [pdf] <http://www.cs.rutgers.edu/~santosh.nagarakatte/papers/alive-fp-sas16.pdf> *David Menendez, Santosh Nagarakatte, and Aarti Gupta *To Appear in the Proceedings of the 23rd Static Analysis

On Mar 30, 2010, at 11:33 AM, John Regehr wrote: > John-- a couple questions: > > Can you explain the SAFECode model in a bit more detail? I am getting > conflicting information. On one hand, some of the papers describe a > system that is primarily designed to hide safety violations. On the other > hand, the 2006 ICSE paper that I cited earlier today seems to be talking

I have a pair of CentOS 6.4 servers running Samba 4.0.3 as DC, and a set of member file servers, also CentOS 6, running Samba 3.6.9, joined to the Samba4 domain and running sssd. Birds sing and violins play. Everyone is happy. Until... A share definition such as: [g_sysmgr] path = /fs/europa/g_sysmgr valid users = +sysgrp works fine from both Linux and Windows clients, eg: %

On Sun, 10 May 2015, Rowland Penny wrote: > You definitely seem to have problems there. Indeed I do :-( > You do know that there are 7 (yes seven) fsmoroles ? Oh crap. I checked on the original DC before I demoted it, and there were only 5 displayed, so I thought that was all I should have. At least, I transferred -all roles, and only those 5 made it. This is going to be a pain to

On Sun, 10 May 2015, Rowland Penny wrote: > It might not be as bad as what you think, do you have the two DNs ? > > ldbedit -e nano -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb -b > "CN=Infrastructure,DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=europa,DC=icse,DC=cornell,DC=edu" Yes, I have both of the dn's. However, neither of them have an fSMORoleOwner attribute. That I will fix and report back.

In need of some help here. I hope I haven't trimmed this too much. As I mentioned before, I have a CentOS 6.3 system using SSSD (only) bound to the samba4 DC as an LDAP server using the following in sssd.conf: [domain/SAMBA] ldap_default_bind_dn = CN=Administrator,CN=Users,DC=... ldap_default_authtok = <supersecret> ldap_default_authtok_type = password ... and everything

Samba 4.1.16, Centos 6.6 x86-64, BIND_DLZ 9.9. I have three AD DC's that were functioning normally. However, today I restarted BIND on one node, and it failed to start with this message in the log (names changed): May 10 07:02:49 benford named[6767]: Loading 'AD DNS Zone' using driver dlopen May 10 07:02:49 benford named[6767]: samba_dlz: started for DN DC=samdom,DC=example,DC=com May

On 10/05/15 12:49, Steve Thompson wrote: > On Sun, 10 May 2015, Rowland Penny wrote: > >> can you post your named conf files. > > Sure. This is samba's: > > dlz "AD DNS Zone" { > database "dlopen /mnt/domain/samba/europa/lib/bind9/dlz_bind9_9.so"; > }; > > and this is BIND's (notice the last line commented out): > > options

Adve, Vikram Sadanand wrote: > On Mar 30, 2010, at 11:33 AM, John Regehr wrote: > > >> John-- a couple questions: >> >> Can you explain the SAFECode model in a bit more detail? I am getting >> conflicting information. On one hand, some of the papers describe a >> system that is primarily designed to hide safety violations. On the other >> hand,

Dear John, > When you say "must be allocated," you mean it must have been allocated via a call to a heap allocator (e.g., malloc(), calloc(), etc), correct? Yes, I mean heap allocators. In fact, I'm implementing the idea of the ICSE 2015 paper Safe Memory-Leak Fixing for C Programs. > Also, are you performing intra-procedural or inter-procedural data-flow analysis?

On 10/05/15 17:25, Steve Thompson wrote: > On Sun, 10 May 2015, Rowland Penny wrote: > >> You definitely seem to have problems there. > > Indeed I do :-( > >> You do know that there are 7 (yes seven) fsmoroles ? > > Oh crap. I checked on the original DC before I demoted it, and there > were only 5 displayed, so I thought that was all I should have. At >