search for: ibrix

Hello, I have a problem with directories that contain more than 10000 entries (Ubuntu 8.04.1) or with more than 70000 entries (RHEL 5.2). If you use readdir(3) or readdir64(3) you get one entry twice, with same name and inode. Some analyzing showed that disabling dir_index solves this problem, but I think that this is a bug in the ext3 code, as no other file-system shows this behavior.

I came across this www.gluster.org Has any one tried it . Is it a true parallel file system allowing concurrent read and write to a file by many processes. Will it be suitable for HPC applications. -- Regards-- Rishi Pathak -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

...Fedora and CentOS workstations that all participate in NIS for user authentication which then, upon a successful login, automount an NFS $HOME directory. And here is the rub, I am migrating that NFS back end FROM a Sun X4540 (which has been working flawlessly for the past few years) to an HP X9320 Ibrix system. I replicated my NFS exports from one system to the other, and have tested command line logins over SSH using NIS credentials and that all seems to work quite well. However, whenever a CentOS (or even Fedora for that matter) desktop user tries to log in (either Gnome or KDE) they are unable...

Dear R-devel, I installed R-2.9.1 on the 'y:' drive which happens to be mounted to an IBRIX file system. I also downloaded and installed the Rtools bundle recommended for 2.9x. When I build a source package launching R via RGui.exe it seems to work fine: ## setting path according to "Appendix E The Windows toolset" > Sys.setenv(PATH="c:/Rtools/bin;c:/Rtools/perl/bin;c:...

Hi all, I am just trying to consider my options for storing a large mass of data (tens of terrabytes of files) and one idea is to build a clustered FS of some kind. Has anybody had any experience with that? Any recommendations? Thanks in advance for any and all advice. Boris.

Hello all, I am looking to build a larger array (6TB) using CentOS 4.4 to archive data to. We want to have the Windows server mount this array as a local drive so we were looking at iSCSI to do it. I have played with it in the past and gotten it to work in this combo, but I have a question about access to the data on the local (Centos) machine. If I understand correctly, when I mount the

Dear ext3-users, I write scientific number-crunching codes which deal with large input and output files (Gb, tens of Gb, as much as hundreds of Gygabytes on occasions). Now there are these multi-core setups like Intel Core 2 Duo becoming available at a low cost. Disk I/O is one of the biggest bottlenecks. I would very much like to put to use the multiple processors to read or write in parallel

There's been a lot of discussion in the past on these somewhat-mysterious "bit already cleared" messages appearing in the logs when using Ext3 file systems. Unfortunately, I didn't see a conclusion to any of these threads. We're still seeing these messages pop up occasionally and fsck's of the file system reveal lot of orphaned inodes and such. Anybody else see these