search for: ib_devices

...their own drivers to the struct ib_device. So you'd have a chain like: struct pci_device -> struct ib_device -> [ib client bus thing] -> struct net_device And the various char devs are created by clients connecting to the ib_device and creating char devs on their own classes. Since ib_devices are multi-queue we can have all 20 devices running concurrently and there are various schemes to manage when the various things are created. > > The 'hw driver' pulls in > > functions from the 'subsystem' using a combination of callbacks and > > library-style call...

Signed-off-by: Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia at oracle.com> --- drivers/infiniband/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/infiniband/hw/Makefile | 1 + drivers/infiniband/hw/virtio/Kconfig | 6 + drivers/infiniband/hw/virtio/Makefile | 4 + drivers/infiniband/hw/virtio/virtio_rdma.h | 40 + .../infiniband/hw/virtio/virtio_rdma_device.c | 59 ++

On 2019/4/11 19:01, Yuval Shaia wrote: > Signed-off-by: Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia at oracle.com> > --- > drivers/infiniband/Kconfig | 1 + > drivers/infiniband/hw/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/infiniband/hw/virtio/Kconfig | 6 + > drivers/infiniband/hw/virtio/Makefile | 4 + >

On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 10:56:00AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:51:54AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > That bus is exactly what Greg KH proposed. There are other ways > > > to solve this I guess but this bikeshedding is getting tiring. > > > > This discussion was for a different goal, IMHO. > > Hmm couldn't find it

On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 10:56:00AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:51:54AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > That bus is exactly what Greg KH proposed. There are other ways > > > to solve this I guess but this bikeshedding is getting tiring. > > > > This discussion was for a different goal, IMHO. > > Hmm couldn't find it

Data center backends use more and more RDMA or RoCE devices and more and more software runs in virtualized environment. There is a need for a standard to enable RDMA/RoCE on Virtual Machines. Virtio is the optimal solution since is the de-facto para-virtualizaton technology and also because the Virtio specification allows Hardware Vendors to support Virtio protocol natively in order to achieve

Data center backends use more and more RDMA or RoCE devices and more and more software runs in virtualized environment. There is a need for a standard to enable RDMA/RoCE on Virtual Machines. Virtio is the optimal solution since is the de-facto para-virtualizaton technology and also because the Virtio specification allows Hardware Vendors to support Virtio protocol natively in order to achieve

On 4/11/19 4:01 AM, Yuval Shaia wrote: > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/virtio/Kconfig > @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ > +config INFINIBAND_VIRTIO_RDMA > + tristate "VirtIO Paravirtualized RDMA Driver" > + depends on NETDEVICES && ETHERNET && PCI && INET > + ---help--- > + This driver provides low-level support for VirtIO Paravirtual > + RDMA adapter.

Hi, This is third approach (complete this time) for replacing struct dma_attrs with unsigned long. The main patch (2/45) doing the change is split into many subpatches for easier review (3-43). They should be squashed together when applying. *Important:* Patchset is *only* build tested on allyesconfigs: ARM, ARM64, i386, x86_64 and powerpc. Please provide reviewes and tests for other

From: John Hubbard <jhubbard at nvidia.com> Hi, This is mostly Jerome's work, converting the block/bio and related areas to call put_user_page*() instead of put_page(). Because I've changed Jerome's patches, in some cases significantly, I'd like to get his feedback before we actually leave him listed as the author (he might want to disown some or all of these). I added a

From: John Hubbard <jhubbard at nvidia.com> Hi, This is mostly Jerome's work, converting the block/bio and related areas to call put_user_page*() instead of put_page(). Because I've changed Jerome's patches, in some cases significantly, I'd like to get his feedback before we actually leave him listed as the author (he might want to disown some or all of these). I added a

From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at mellanox.com> 8 of the mmu_notifier using drivers (i915_gem, radeon_mn, umem_odp, hfi1, scif_dma, vhost, gntdev, hmm) drivers are using a common pattern where they only use invalidate_range_start/end and immediately check the invalidating range against some driver data structure to tell if the driver is interested. Half of them use an interval_tree, the others

From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro at nvidia.com> Changelog: v1: * Renamed _mlx5_rescan_driver to be mlx5_rescan_driver_locked like in other parts of the mlx5 driver. * Renamed MLX5_INTERFACE_PROTOCOL_VDPA to tbe MLX5_INTERFACE_PROTOCOL_VNET as a preparation to coming series from Eli C. * Some small naming renames in mlx5_vdpa. * Refactored adev index code to make Parav's SF series

From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at mellanox.com> 8 of the mmu_notifier using drivers (i915_gem, radeon_mn, umem_odp, hfi1, scif_dma, vhost, gntdev, hmm) drivers are using a common pattern where they only use invalidate_range_start/end and immediately check the invalidating range against some driver data structure to tell if the driver is interested. Half of them use an interval_tree, the others