search for: iasme

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "iasme".

Did you mean: iase
2009 Aug 01
1
[LLVMdev] Inserting Instructions (pass)
Hi, both versions are working: FunctionType *asm_Ftype = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy, std::vector<const Type*>(), false); InlineAsm* Iasm = InlineAsm::get(asm_Ftype,"isync","~{dirflag},~{fpsr},~{flags}",true); How can I insert this InlineAsm, because it is no instruction and this way it will not work: Instruction *pi = bi;
2004 Mar 04
0
WSEAS NEWSLETTER in MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
...you want to contact us, the Subject of your email must contains the code: WSEAS CALL FOR PAPERS -- CALL FOR REVIEWERS -- CALL FOR SPECIAL SESSIONS wseas at canada.com http://wseas.freeservers.com **************************************************************** Udine, Italy, March 25-27, 2004: IASME/WSEAS 2004 Int.Conf. on MECHANICS and MECHATRONICS **************************************************************** Miami, Florida, USA, April 21-23, 2004 5th WSEAS International Conference on APPLIED MATHEMATICS (SYMPOSIA on: Linear Algebra and Applications, Numerical Analysis and Application...
2009 Aug 01
0
[LLVMdev] Inserting Instructions (pass)
On Jul 31, 2009, at 5:04 PM, Michael Graumann wrote: > Thank you Chris, > for your hint, but I am still too stupid. I tried two versions > > asm_arguments.push_back(Type::VoidTy); > FunctionType *asm_type = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy, > asm_arguments, false); > > Alternatively > > FunctionType *asm_type = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy, >
2009 Aug 01
2
[LLVMdev] Inserting Instructions (pass)
Thank you Chris, for your hint, but I am still too stupid. I tried two versions asm_arguments.push_back(Type::VoidTy); FunctionType *asm_type = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy, asm_arguments, false); Alternatively FunctionType *asm_type = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy, std::vector<const Type*>(), false); . Can you give me a snippet of example code, or somebody else?
2006 Nov 25
3
[LLVMdev] LLVM Newb: Getting started
Am Freitag, 24. November 2006 03:00 schrieb Reid Spencer: > If you're making your own front end, you probably won't need it :) Well, I wanted to play around with it, so see, how my older programs perform with it. So far I managed to get some programs running by folowing scheme: for src in $infiles; do llvm-gcc -o $src.bc -c $src ; opt -f -o $src.bc.opt $src.bc ; llc -f $src.bc.opt
2006 Nov 24
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM Newb: Getting started
Hi Wolfgang, On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 19:47 +0100, Wolfgang Draxinger wrote: > A few days ago Craig Black made the suggestion in the D newsgroup, > that someone creates a D <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/index.html> > frontend for LLVM. Never having heard of LLVM in the past, I > immediately got captured by its design when I've read the > documentation. I was always
2006 Nov 23
3
[LLVMdev] LLVM Newb: Getting started
A few days ago Craig Black made the suggestion in the D newsgroup, that someone creates a D <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/index.html> frontend for LLVM. Never having heard of LLVM in the past, I immediately got captured by its design when I've read the documentation. I was always scared by GCC - a great piece of software, but horribly bad documented, and in it's own way not very