Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "iasme".
Did you mean:
iase
2009 Aug 01
1
[LLVMdev] Inserting Instructions (pass)
Hi,
both versions are working:
FunctionType *asm_Ftype = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy, std::vector<const
Type*>(), false);
InlineAsm* Iasm =
InlineAsm::get(asm_Ftype,"isync","~{dirflag},~{fpsr},~{flags}",true);
How can I insert this InlineAsm, because it is no instruction and this way
it will not work:
Instruction *pi = bi;
2004 Mar 04
0
WSEAS NEWSLETTER in MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
...you want to contact us, the Subject of your email must contains the code:
WSEAS
CALL FOR PAPERS -- CALL FOR REVIEWERS -- CALL FOR SPECIAL SESSIONS
wseas at canada.com
http://wseas.freeservers.com
****************************************************************
Udine, Italy, March 25-27, 2004:
IASME/WSEAS 2004 Int.Conf. on MECHANICS and MECHATRONICS
****************************************************************
Miami, Florida, USA, April 21-23, 2004
5th WSEAS International Conference on APPLIED MATHEMATICS (SYMPOSIA on: Linear
Algebra and Applications, Numerical Analysis and Application...
2009 Aug 01
0
[LLVMdev] Inserting Instructions (pass)
On Jul 31, 2009, at 5:04 PM, Michael Graumann wrote:
> Thank you Chris,
> for your hint, but I am still too stupid. I tried two versions
>
> asm_arguments.push_back(Type::VoidTy);
> FunctionType *asm_type = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy,
> asm_arguments, false);
>
> Alternatively
>
> FunctionType *asm_type = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy,
>
2009 Aug 01
2
[LLVMdev] Inserting Instructions (pass)
Thank you Chris,
for your hint, but I am still too stupid. I tried two versions
asm_arguments.push_back(Type::VoidTy);
FunctionType *asm_type = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy, asm_arguments,
false);
Alternatively
FunctionType *asm_type = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy, std::vector<const
Type*>(), false);
. Can you give me a snippet of example code, or somebody else?
2006 Nov 25
3
[LLVMdev] LLVM Newb: Getting started
Am Freitag, 24. November 2006 03:00 schrieb Reid Spencer:
> If you're making your own front end, you probably won't need it :)
Well, I wanted to play around with it, so see, how my older programs
perform with it.
So far I managed to get some programs running by folowing scheme:
for src in $infiles; do
llvm-gcc -o $src.bc -c $src ;
opt -f -o $src.bc.opt $src.bc ;
llc -f $src.bc.opt
2006 Nov 24
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM Newb: Getting started
Hi Wolfgang,
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 19:47 +0100, Wolfgang Draxinger wrote:
> A few days ago Craig Black made the suggestion in the D newsgroup,
> that someone creates a D <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/index.html>
> frontend for LLVM. Never having heard of LLVM in the past, I
> immediately got captured by its design when I've read the
> documentation. I was always
2006 Nov 23
3
[LLVMdev] LLVM Newb: Getting started
A few days ago Craig Black made the suggestion in the D newsgroup,
that someone creates a D <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/index.html>
frontend for LLVM. Never having heard of LLVM in the past, I
immediately got captured by its design when I've read the
documentation. I was always scared by GCC - a great piece of
software, but horribly bad documented, and in it's own way not very