search for: iasm

Hi, both versions are working: FunctionType *asm_Ftype = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy, std::vector<const Type*>(), false); InlineAsm* Iasm = InlineAsm::get(asm_Ftype,"isync","~{dirflag},~{fpsr},~{flags}",true); How can I insert this InlineAsm, because it is no instruction and this way it will not work: Instruction *pi = bi; pi->getParent()->getInstList().insert(pi, Iasm); I try to build a CallIns...

...you want to contact us, the Subject of your email must contains the code: WSEAS CALL FOR PAPERS -- CALL FOR REVIEWERS -- CALL FOR SPECIAL SESSIONS wseas at canada.com http://wseas.freeservers.com **************************************************************** Udine, Italy, March 25-27, 2004: IASME/WSEAS 2004 Int.Conf. on MECHANICS and MECHATRONICS **************************************************************** Miami, Florida, USA, April 21-23, 2004 5th WSEAS International Conference on APPLIED MATHEMATICS (SYMPOSIA on: Linear Algebra and Applications, Numerical Analysis and Applicatio...

On Jul 31, 2009, at 5:04 PM, Michael Graumann wrote: > Thank you Chris, > for your hint, but I am still too stupid. I tried two versions > > asm_arguments.push_back(Type::VoidTy); > FunctionType *asm_type = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy, > asm_arguments, false); > > Alternatively > > FunctionType *asm_type = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy, >

Thank you Chris, for your hint, but I am still too stupid. I tried two versions asm_arguments.push_back(Type::VoidTy); FunctionType *asm_type = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy, asm_arguments, false); Alternatively FunctionType *asm_type = FunctionType::get(Type::VoidTy, std::vector<const Type*>(), false); . Can you give me a snippet of example code, or somebody else?

...onditional comilation, so the following would be completely valid: void foo(){ version(x86) { asm { /* x86 assembler */ } } else version(llvm) { asm { /* llvm assembler */ } } else { /* plain D implementation */ } } <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/iasm.html> <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/version.html> Any ideas, how this could be integrated with LLVM? The IMHO most naive approach would be to add labels where the asm begins and ends. Then the plattform dependent assembler being parted from the code llvm gets to see and being processed...

Hi Wolfgang, On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 19:47 +0100, Wolfgang Draxinger wrote: > A few days ago Craig Black made the suggestion in the D newsgroup, > that someone creates a D <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/index.html> > frontend for LLVM. Never having heard of LLVM in the past, I > immediately got captured by its design when I've read the > documentation. I was always

A few days ago Craig Black made the suggestion in the D newsgroup, that someone creates a D <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/index.html> frontend for LLVM. Never having heard of LLVM in the past, I immediately got captured by its design when I've read the documentation. I was always scared by GCC - a great piece of software, but horribly bad documented, and in it's own way not very