search for: iamanidiot

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "iamanidiot".

2004 Sep 10
2
beta 1.0.3 ERROR
The test script doesn't seem to stop on error. I noticed this in the logs: ++++++ testing level 1 interface simple iterator on read-only file generating FLAC file for test testing 'metadata.flac'... 0... 1... content... PASSED is writable = 1 ERROR: iterator claims file is writable when it should not be ERROR during test_libFLAC FAIL: ./test_libFLAC.sh Platform is a mobile
2004 Sep 10
1
beta 1.0.3 ERROR
--- David Willmore <davidwillmore@iamanidiot.com> wrote: > > The test script doesn't seem to stop on error. I noticed this > in the logs: > > ++++++ testing level 1 interface > simple iterator on read-only file > generating FLAC file for test > testing 'metadata.flac'... 0... 1... content... PASSED &...
2004 Sep 10
0
beta 1.0.3 ERROR
--- David Willmore <davidwillmore@iamanidiot.com> wrote: > > The test script doesn't seem to stop on error. I noticed this > in the logs: > > ++++++ testing level 1 interface > simple iterator on read-only file > generating FLAC file for test > testing 'metadata.flac'... 0... 1... content... PASSED &...
2004 Aug 06
2
--dtx alone does nothing?
> > So there should be some equivalency between --abr values and --quality > > values? Or do they effect the rate in different ways. > > Actually, --abr adjusts the quality in real-time so that the average > bit-rate meets a certain target. with just --quality, the final average > bit-rate is dependent on the data, so that's why --abr is there. Is there some time
2004 Aug 06
2
--dtx alone does nothing?
> > Is there some time window over which it tries to meet this average? > > Right now, it looks at what's the average bit-rate so far and does some > adjustments to meet the target. There might be ways to improve, it's > very rough right now. Also, note that you'll likely get better results > by trying several --quality until you get the right bit-rate than with
2004 Aug 06
2
--dtx alone does nothing?
> All you say look normal to me. Okay, clarification requires less code to be written than a bug. :) > > Does that makes sense? I would have thought that --dtx alone would have = > doen it, > > but maybe it needs perfect digital silence to work? Or only uses the voi= > ce activation > > to know when there's silence? > > DTX requires the VAD to know when
2004 Aug 06
2
--dtx alone does nothing?
I'm running a: for band in n w u do for quality in 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 do for complexity in 3 do for vad in "" "--vad" do for dtx in "" "--dtx" do echo speexenc -${band} --quality ${quality} --comp ${complexity} ${vad} ${dtx} input.${band}.wav