search for: i_size_high

Has anyone tried LFS (ie >2G files support) and Ext3 together? Are there good reasons why this should/should not work? I see the RH enterprise kernel patch set specifically does not attempt both lfs and ext3, but the lfs patches themselves touch some reasonably localised parts of ext2, so I would hope (without having dived in there to test), that the ext3 changes would mirror that

How big is a file that e2fsck considers it to be a large file? 814611 blocks used (42.79%) 0 bad blocks 1 large file <----- that Thanks John Nelson

...t_stack_timespec_sec(&dst->otime, 0); - btrfs_set_stack_timespec_nsec(&dst->otime, 0); - - if (S_ISDIR(src->i_mode)) { - btrfs_set_stack_inode_size(dst, 0); - btrfs_set_stack_inode_nlink(dst, 1); - } - if (S_ISREG(src->i_mode)) { - btrfs_set_stack_inode_size(dst, (u64)src->i_size_high << 32 | - (u64)src->i_size); - } - if (!S_ISREG(src->i_mode) && !S_ISDIR(src->i_mode) && - !S_ISLNK(src->i_mode)) { - if (src->i_block[0]) { - btrfs_set_stack_inode_rdev(dst, - old_decode_dev(src->i_block[0])); - } else { - btrfs_set_stack...

Hi, The following patches add support for ext4 and btrfs to PV-GRUB. These patches are taken nearly verbatim from those provided by Fedora and Gentoo. We''ve been using these patches for the PV-GRUB images available in EC2 for some time now with no problems. Changes from v1: - Makefile has been changed to check the exit code from patch - The btrfs patch has been rebased to apply