search for: i_opflag

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "i_opflag".

Did you mean: i_opflags
2023 Jan 30
1
[PATCH 00/12] acl: remove remaining posix acl handlers
...ry limited set of filesystems. For most of them there is no > dependence on the generic POSIX ACL xattr handler in any way. > > In addition, during inode initalization in inode_init_always() the > registered xattr handlers in sb->s_xattr are used to raise IOP_XATTR in > inode->i_opflags. > > With the incoming removal of the legacy POSIX ACL handlers it is at > least possible for a filesystem to only implement POSIX ACLs but no > other xattrs. If that were to happen we would miss to raise IOP_XATTR > because sb->s_xattr would be NULL. While there currently is no...
2023 Jan 25
2
[PATCH 00/12] acl: remove remaining posix acl handlers
...ns. First, because a few filesystems relied on the ->list() method of the generic POSIX ACL xattr handlers in their ->listxattr() inode operation. Second, during inode initalization in inode_init_always() the registered xattr handlers in sb->s_xattr are used to raise IOP_XATTR in inode->i_opflags. With the removal of the legacy POSIX ACL handlers it is at least possible for a filesystem to only implement POSIX ACLs but no other xattrs. If that were to happen we would miss to raise IOP_XATTR because sb->s_xattr would be NULL. Fix these things and then get rid of the misleading and effe...