search for: i_fadd

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "i_fadd".

Did you mean: r_fadd
2011 Jul 30
3
[LLVMdev] "Cannot select" error in 2.9
..., LLVM can't, but it can fadd them. ;) "add" only accepts integers and vectors of integers, "fadd" accepts floats and vectors of floats. See their entries in the language reference: add: http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#i_add fadd: http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#i_fadd The split is intended to let us add additional properties to integer adds (like the nuw/nsw bits documented) that don't apply to floats, and properties to floats (rounding modes) that don't apply to ints. Nick For > completeness, the original assembly dump: > > define double...
2015 Feb 19
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Minor typos corrected in docs
...ddr`` are guaranteed to have the same address as +Aliases that are not ``unnamed_addr`` are guaranteed to have the same address as the aliasee expression. ``unnamed_addr`` ones are only guaranteed to point to the same content. @@ -1779,7 +1779,7 @@ LLVM IR floating-point binary ops (:ref:`fadd <i_fadd>`, :ref:`fsub <i_fsub>`, :ref:`fmul <i_fmul>`, :ref:`fdiv <i_fdiv>`, -:ref:`frem <i_frem>`) have the following flags that can set to enable +:ref:`frem <i_frem>`) have the following flags that can be set to enable otherwise unsafe floating point operations ``nnan``...
2011 Jul 30
0
[LLVMdev] "Cannot select" error in 2.9
...fadd them. ;) "add" only accepts integers > and > vectors of integers, "fadd" accepts floats and vectors of floats. See > their entries in the language reference: > > add: http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#i_add > fadd: http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#i_fadd > > The split is intended to let us add additional properties to integer > adds (like the nuw/nsw bits documented) that don't apply to floats, and > properties to floats (rounding modes) that don't apply to ints. Ah interesting -- this was introduced in 2.9 then? Easy enough...
2011 Jul 30
0
[LLVMdev] "Cannot select" error in 2.9
> > -----Original Message----- > > From: Rotem, Nadav [mailto:nadav.rotem at intel.com] > > Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2011 6:51 AM > > To: Gregory Junker > > Subject: RE: [LLVMdev] "Cannot select" error in 2.9 > > > > Can you reduce the test with bug-point ? Does it work on ToT ? > > Hi Nadav > > I'm not sure what those are --
2011 Jul 30
2
[LLVMdev] "Cannot select" error in 2.9
> -----Original Message----- > From: Rotem, Nadav [mailto:nadav.rotem at intel.com] > Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2011 6:51 AM > To: Gregory Junker > Subject: RE: [LLVMdev] "Cannot select" error in 2.9 > > Can you reduce the test with bug-point ? Does it work on ToT ? Hi Nadav I'm not sure what those are -- can you clarify? Thanks Greg