Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "i_dirti".
Did you mean:
i_dirty
2004 Sep 16
1
[PATCH] BUG on fsync/fdatasync with Ext3 data=journal
Hello,
We found that fsync and fdatasync syscalls sometimes don't sync
data in an ext3 file system under the following conditions.
1. Kernel version is 2.6.6 or later (including 2.6.8.1 and 2.6.9-rc2).
2. Ext3's journalling mode is "data=journal".
3. Create a file (whose size is 1Mbytes) and execute umount/mount.
4. lseek to a random position within the file, write 8192 bytes
2009 Feb 02
5
[PATCH] btrfs: call mark_inode_dirty when i_size is updated
Hi Chris.
I think it is needed to call mark_inode_dirty() when file size expands
in order to flush metadata updates to HDD through sync() syscall or
background_writeout().
Thanks.
Signed-off-by: Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp>
diff -Nrup linux-2.6.29-rc3.org/fs/btrfs/file.c linux-2.6.29-rc3/fs/btrfs/file.c
--- linux-2.6.29-rc3.org/fs/btrfs/file.c 2009-02-02
2011 Jun 24
10
[PATCH 0/9] remove i_alloc_sem V2
i_alloc_sem has always been a bit of an odd "lock". It''s the only remaining
rw_semaphore that can be released by a different thread than the one that
locked it, and it''s use case in the core direct I/O code is more like a
counter given that the writers already have external serialization.
This series removes it in favour of a simpler counter scheme, thus getting
rid