search for: i63

Hi all, hope someone can help me out with this. Background Introduction I have a data set consisting of data collected from a questionnaire that I wish to validate. I have chosen to use confirmatory factor analysis to analyse this data set. Instrument The instrument consists of 11 subscales. There is a total of 68 items in the 11 subscales. Each item is scored on an integer scale between 1 to 4.

...25.i, %tmp34.i52.i > %tmp36.i54.i = fadd float %tmp35.i53.i, 0x3FD470BF40000000 > %tmp37.i55.i = fmul float %tmp19.i37.i, %tmp36.i54.i > %tmp38.i56.i = fsub float 1.000000e+00, %tmp37.i55.i > %cmp.i59.i = fcmp olt float %tmp56.i, 0.000000e+00 > br i1 %cmp.i59.i, label %cond.then.i63.i, label %phi.exit69.i > > cond.then.i63.i: ; preds = %phi.exit.i > %tmp43.i62.i = fsub float 1.000000e+00, %tmp38.i56.i > br label %phi.exit69.i > > phi.exit69.i: ; preds = %cond.then.i63.i, %phi.exit.i >...

Hello everybody, I have stumbled upon a test case (the attached module is a slightly reduced version) that shows extremely reduced performance on linux compared to windows when executed using LLVM's JIT. We narrowed the problem down to the actual code being generated, the source IR on both systems is the same. Try compiling the attached module: llc -O3 -filetype=asm -o BAD.s BAD.ll Under

...shl.i.i = shl nuw nsw i32 %conv5.i.i, 1 %conv14.i.i = trunc i32 %shl.i.i to i16 %.pre1004.i = load i16* %incdec.ptr.i602.i, align 2, !tbaa !5 %phitmp1011.i = add i32 %i.025.i.i, 1 br label %for.body.i599.i for.body.i610.i: ; preds = %if.end12.i.i, %if.end12.i631.i %i.025.i605.i = phi i32 [ %inc.i629.i, %if.end12.i631.i ], [ 2, %if.end12.i.i ] %bits.024.i606.i = phi i16 [ %conv14.i627.i, %if.end12.i631.i ], [ 0, %if.end12.i.i ] %x.addr.023.i607.i = phi i16* [ %incdec.ptr.i628.i, %if.end12.i631.i ], [ %incdec.ptr1.1.i581.i, %if.end12.i.i ] %267 = lo...