search for: i30

Hi all, hope someone can help me out with this. Background Introduction I have a data set consisting of data collected from a questionnaire that I wish to validate. I have chosen to use confirmatory factor analysis to analyse this data set. Instrument The instrument consists of 11 subscales. There is a total of 68 items in the 11 subscales. Each item is scored on an integer scale between 1 to 4.

...hat doesn't want to implement varargs or by-value calling conventions. * Instruction-level lowering: * ExpandStructRegs splits up struct values into scalars, removing the "insertvalue" and "extractvalue" instructions. * PromoteIntegers legalizes integer types (e.g. i30 is converted to i32). * Module-level lowering: This implements, at the IR level, functionality that is traditionally provided by "ld". e.g. ExpandCtors lowers llvm.global_ctors to the __init_array_start and __init_array_end symbols that are used by C libraries at startup. PNaCl's...

...nt Bitcode 1 ; ModuleID = 'gu.c' 2 target datalayout = "e-p:32:32:32-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32 -f64:64:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-f192:32:32" 3 target triple = "ovm-none-linux" 4 5 %struct.foo = type { i4(char), i61(longlong), i30(int) } 6 7 @var = common global %struct.foo zeroinitializer ; <%struct.foo*> [#uses=0] Target Dependent Bitcode ARM 1 ; ModuleID = 'gu.mod.opt.arm.bc' 2 target datalayout = "e-p:32:32:32-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32 -f64:64:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:...

...to >>>> implement varargs or by-value calling conventions. >>> >>> Why wouldn't these be applicable to existing backends? What is >>> hard about the existing representations? And this... >>>>    * PromoteIntegers legalizes integer types (e.g. i30 is >>>> converted to i32). >>> >>> Does it split up too-wide integers? Do we really want another >>> integer legalization framework in LLVM? I am actually interested >>> in doing (partial) legalization in the IR during lowering >>> (codegenpr...

L.S. I seem to remember this being a bit easier, apparently i'm wrong: Code: [xolo at sasquatch .wine]$ wine d:\\Setup.exe err:alsa:ALSA_CheckSetVolume Could not find 'PCM Playback Volume' element fixme:mixer:ALSA_MixerInit No master control found on Brooktree Bt878, disabling mixer fixme:mixer:ALSA_MixerInit No master control found on USB Device 0x46d:0x8b2, disabling mixer

...ractvalue" instructions. >> > > There are already passes that do this outside of function arguments and > return values. Why is a new one needed? How do you handle the > overflow-detecting operations? > > > >> * PromoteIntegers legalizes integer types (e.g. i30 is converted to >> i32). >> > > Does it split up too-wide integers? Do we really want another integer > legalization framework in LLVM? I am actually interested in doing (partial) > legalization in the IR during lowering (codegenprep time) in order to > simplify the backe...

....false.i29: ; preds = %cond.true5.i26.thread, %cond.true5.i26 %call.i28 = call i32 @check_func() #5 br label %copy.exit33 cond.false9.i31: ; preds = %if.end.thread53, %if.end %5 = bitcast [16 x i8]* %group17 to i8* %call10.i30 = call i8* @copy2(i64 16, i8* nonnull %5, i8* %py_grp, i64 %conv) #5 br label %copy.exit33 copy.exit33: ; preds = %cond.true8.i27, %cond.false.i29, %cond.false9.i31 %.pre-phi49 = phi i1 [ true, %cond.true8.i27 ], [ true, %cond.false.i29 ], [ false, %cond.false9....

Hey :D Mac OSX 10.5 here. I'm having lots of trouble with Darwine. When I try to launch an app I get the following sign (sometimes): [Image: http://i30.tinypic.com/2e5v0xe.png ] And in the log I get: Code: X connection to :0.0 broken (explicit kill or server shutdown). fixme:heap:HeapSetInformation 0x110000 0 0x46ee5c 4 X connection to :0.0 broken (explicit kill or server shutdown). Please ensure that your X server is running and that $DISPLAY i...

...i.i, label %for.inc.1.i.i27.i.i.i.i, label %if.end7.i.i.i.i for.inc.1.i.i27.i.i.i.i: ; preds = %for.inc.i.i24.i.i.i.i %137 = load i16* %incdec.ptr.1.i49.i.i, align 2, !tbaa !5 %cmp5.2.i.i26.i.i.i.i = icmp eq i16 %137, 0 br i1 %cmp5.2.i.i26.i.i.i.i, label %for.inc.2.i.i30.i.i.i.i, label %if.end7.i.i.i.i for.inc.2.i.i30.i.i.i.i: ; preds = %for.inc.1.i.i27.i.i.i.i %138 = load i16* %incdec.ptr.2.i50.i.i, align 2, !tbaa !5 %cmp5.3.i.i29.i.i.i.i = icmp eq i16 %138, 0 br i1 %cmp5.3.i.i29.i.i.i.i, label %for.inc.3.i.i33.i.i.i.i, label %if.en...