search for: i19

...ple of what it could look like: /// Size examples: /// /// Type SizeInBits StoreSizeInBits AllocSizeInBits[*] /// ---- ---------- --------------- --------------- /// i1 1 8 8 /// i8 8 8 8 /// i19 19 24 32 /// i32 32 32 32 /// i100 100 104 128 /// i128 128 128 128 /// Float 32 32 32 /// Double 64 64 6...

...inter/DwarfDebug.cpp': assert(EndLabel && "Forgot label after instruction ending a range!"); The values of related variables at this time are: 'Begin' is: DBG_VALUE %I23, %noreg, !"fp", <!345>; line no:381 'End' is: DBG_VALUE %I19, 88, !"ap", <!345>; line no:381 indirect 'StartLabel' is: .Ltmp327 'I19' is the stack-pointer, and it is the expression 'EndLabel = getLabelAfterInsn(End)' that is returning 'nullptr'. This happens only when compiling 'vfprintf.c' or ...

...smPrinter/DwarfDebug.cpp': assert(EndLabel && "Forgot label after instruction ending a range!"); The values of related variables at this time are: 'Begin' is: DBG_VALUE %I23, %noreg, !"fp", <!345>; line no:381 'End' is: DBG_VALUE %I19, 88, !"ap", <!345>; line no:381 indirect 'StartLabel' is: .Ltmp327 'I19' is the stack-pointer, and it is the expression 'EndLabel = getLabelAfterInsn(End)' that is returning 'nullptr'. This happens only when compiling 'vfprintf.c' or 'v...

...fyModel() F1->i2,a1 F1->i3,a2 F1->i4,a3 F1->i11,a4 F1->i12,a5 F1->i15,a6 F1->i18,a7 F2->i6,b1 F2->i7,b2 F2->i8,b3 F2->i13,b4 F2->i20,b5 F3->F1,c1 F3->F2,c2 F4->i1,d1 F4->i5,d2 F4->i9,d3 F4->i10,d4 F4->i14,d5 F4->i16,d6 F4->i17,d7 F4->i19,d8 F1<->F1,NA,1 F2<->F2,NA,1 F3<->F3,NA,1 F4<->F4,NA,1 i2<->i2,error1 i4<->i4,error2 i6<->i6,error3 i7<->i7,error4 i8<->i8,error5 i11<->i11,error6 i13<->i13,error7 i15<->i15,error8 i18<->i18,error9 i20<->i20,error10...

Hi all, hope someone can help me out with this. Background Introduction I have a data set consisting of data collected from a questionnaire that I wish to validate. I have chosen to use confirmatory factor analysis to analyse this data set. Instrument The instrument consists of 11 subscales. There is a total of 68 items in the 11 subscales. Each item is scored on an integer scale between 1 to 4.

...33343322 2213241223212322222223333 3113244123342212232312334 2113241123342213232313334 2114141123112214222113334 . . . . The syntax is: AGGREGATE /OUTFILE='C:\Documents and Settings\Coraz?n\Mis documentos\copia.sav' /BREAK=i1 i2 i3 i4 i5 i6 i7 i8 i9 i10 i11 i12 i13 i14 i15 i16 i17 i18 i19 i20 i21 i22 i23 i24 i25 /N_BREAK=N. The results is: 1112241123312213222443444 1 2111141123112212312313334 1 2111141123112414212113344 2 2111241123112311124312231 1 2111341122112111412113341 1 2111341123312213312413334 1 2112141123212213212213334 1 2112211122212413421213221 1 21122411133...

...neric implementation. > "Lots of parameterization" sounds about right. There should just be a pass in the backend that legalizes intrinsics that aren't directly supported by the target. The analogy is to something like llvm.sadd_with_overflow: a frontend can use that intrinsic on i19 if it wants, and that obviously won't map directly to a single instruction, so LLVM legalizes it to operations that *are* directly supported. If your target has direct support for saturating signed additions on a specific format, the legalization pass can let those through, but otherwise it sh...

On 2018-08-22 05:56, John McCall via llvm-dev wrote: >> On Aug 21, 2018, at 6:20 PM, Leonard Chan <leonardchan at google.com> wrote: >> If we were to create a new type down the line, I think the main >> features that would distinguish them from other types are the >> arbitrary width and scale. Saturation can be handled through >> instructions since saturation

I am trying to write a function that will solve a simple system of nonlinear equations for the parameters that describe the beta distribution (a,b) given the mean and variance. mean = a/(a+b) variance = (a*b)/(((a+b)^2) * (a+b+1)) Any help as to where to start would be welcome. -- Scott Story Graduate Student MSU Ecology Department 319 Lewis Hall Bozeman, Mt 59717 406.994.2670 sstory at

...32 8 %incdec.ptr.8.i165.i.i.i.i = getelementptr inbounds [13 x i16]* %bi.i.i.i.i, i32 0, i32 9 %incdec.ptr.9.i167.i.i.i.i = getelementptr inbounds [13 x i16]* %bi.i.i.i.i, i32 0, i32 10 %incdec.ptr.10.i169.i.i.i.i = getelementptr inbounds [13 x i16]* %bi.i.i.i.i, i32 0, i32 11 %incdec.ptr.1.i197.i.i.i.i = getelementptr inbounds [13 x i16]* %ai.i.i.i.i, i32 0, i32 2 %incdec.ptr.2.i199.i.i.i.i = getelementptr inbounds [13 x i16]* %ai.i.i.i.i, i32 0, i32 3 %incdec.ptr.3.i201.i.i.i.i = getelementptr inbounds [13 x i16]* %ai.i.i.i.i, i32 0, i32 4 %incdec.ptr.4.i203.i.i.i.i = getelementpt...

...ses=1] >> %andnps.i17 = add <4 x i32> <i32 1, i32 1, i32 1, i32 1>, %not.i16 ; <<4 x i32>> [#uses=1] >> %orps.i18 = or <4 x i32> %andnps.i17, %andps.i14 ; <<4 x i32>> [#uses=1] >> %bitcast17.i19 = bitcast <4 x i32> %orps.i18 to <4 x float> ; <<4 x float>> [#uses=1] >> - %tmp83 = call <4 x float> @llvm.x86.sse.min.ps(<4 x float> %mul310, <4 x float> zeroinitializer) nounwind ; <<4 x float>> [#uses=1]...