search for: i17

...(i12 in levels(k$pocpart6F)){ l<-subset(k,k$pocpart6F==i12) for(i13 in levels(l$styk6F)){ m<-subset(l,l$styk6F6==i13) for(i14 in levels(k$kond6F)){ n<-subset(m,m$kond6F==i14) for(i15 in levels(k$styd)){ o<-subset(n,n$styd==i15) for(i16 in levels(k$zasl)){ p<-subset(o,o$zasl==i16) for(i17 in levels(p$izol)){ r<-subset(p,p$izol==i17) i<-i+1 n<-length(r$pohl) data2[i,]<-c(n,i1,i2,i3,i4,i5,i6,i7,i8,i9,i10,i11,i12,i13,i14,i15,i16,i17) }}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}} I believe that there exist smart solution, thanks -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/count...

...0x15c9bb920: i32 = TargetConstant<0> 0x15c9bb8b8: i32 = TargetGlobalAddress<void (i8*, i32, i8*, i8*)* @__assert_func> 0 0x15c9bbd98: ch,glue = MYISD::CALL 0x15c9bbcc8, TargetGlobalAddress:i32<void (i8*, i32, i8*, i8*)* @__assert_func> 0, Register:i32 %I18, Register:i32 %I17, Register:i32 %I16, Register:i32 %I15, RegisterMask:Untyped, 0x15c9bbcc8:1 0x15c9bb8b8: i32 = TargetGlobalAddress<void (i8*, i32, i8*, i8*)* @__assert_func> 0 0x15c9bb9f0: i32 = Register %I18 0x15c9bbac0: i32 = Register %I17 0x15c9bbb90: i32 = Register %I16 0x15c...

Hi, I'm a beginner in both statistics and the usage of R. I have been stuck for days with a problem I hope somebody is willing to help me solving. I'm trying to create some kind of graphical plot etc. of my results of the following glm of interactions. I17<-glm(formula = response ~ var1+ var2 + var3 + var4 + var1:var3 + var1:var4, data = data) Is there any possibility to solve this?? Thanks in advance!! -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Interaction-plot-glm-tp4642354.html Sent from the R help mailing list archiv...

...odel<-specifyModel() F1->i2,a1 F1->i3,a2 F1->i4,a3 F1->i11,a4 F1->i12,a5 F1->i15,a6 F1->i18,a7 F2->i6,b1 F2->i7,b2 F2->i8,b3 F2->i13,b4 F2->i20,b5 F3->F1,c1 F3->F2,c2 F4->i1,d1 F4->i5,d2 F4->i9,d3 F4->i10,d4 F4->i14,d5 F4->i16,d6 F4->i17,d7 F4->i19,d8 F1<->F1,NA,1 F2<->F2,NA,1 F3<->F3,NA,1 F4<->F4,NA,1 i2<->i2,error1 i4<->i4,error2 i6<->i6,error3 i7<->i7,error4 i8<->i8,error5 i11<->i11,error6 i13<->i13,error7 i15<->i15,error8 i18<->i18,error9 i20<-&...

...etConstant<0> > 0x15c9bb8b8: i32 = TargetGlobalAddress<void (i8*, i32, i8*, i8*)* > @__assert_func> 0 > 0x15c9bbd98: ch,glue = MYISD::CALL 0x15c9bbcc8, > TargetGlobalAddress:i32<void (i8*, i32, i8*, i8*)* @__assert_func> 0, > Register:i32 %I18, Register:i32 %I17, Register:i32 %I16, Register:i32 %I15, > RegisterMask:Untyped, 0x15c9bbcc8:1 > 0x15c9bb8b8: i32 = TargetGlobalAddress<void (i8*, i32, i8*, i8*)* > @__assert_func> 0 > 0x15c9bb9f0: i32 = Register %I18 > 0x15c9bbac0: i32 = Register %I17 > 0x15c9bbb90: i...

Hi Eli, Recently, I proposed some changes to LLVM to do more lowering of illegal types (like i128 or i17) and other things within the LLVM IR layer, and the proposal was roundly rejected by the LLVM community: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-April/061567.html PNaCl is essentially doing what my proposal described. How do you expect to reconcile the community's desire to avoid doin...

Hi all, hope someone can help me out with this. Background Introduction I have a data set consisting of data collected from a questionnaire that I wish to validate. I have chosen to use confirmatory factor analysis to analyse this data set. Instrument The instrument consists of 11 subscales. There is a total of 68 items in the 11 subscales. Each item is scored on an integer scale between 1 to 4.

..._{j,k}) \over \Pr(1-p_{j,k})}) = \theta_j - \alpha_k, That is, the log odds of answering an test item correctly is a function of the item difficulty (\theta_j) and the ability of individual students (\alpha_k). The following R syntax gives me the \theta coefficients associated with items i5 to i17, but summary() does not automatically summarize the log odds associated with the strata "id". I suppose the log odds associated with strata(id) gives me \alpha_k. But I can't seem to get them with summary(). Help is greatly appreciated. Yuelin Li. ---- my R syntax is -----------...

Dear useRs from the physiology department, Does someone know of an implementation of the SF-36 questionnaire scoring in R? I only found SAS and STATA versions, e.g http://gim.med.ucla.edu/FacultyPages/Hays/util.htm Dieter

...3323233333343322 2213241223212322222223333 3113244123342212232312334 2113241123342213232313334 2114141123112214222113334 . . . . The syntax is: AGGREGATE /OUTFILE='C:\Documents and Settings\Coraz?n\Mis documentos\copia.sav' /BREAK=i1 i2 i3 i4 i5 i6 i7 i8 i9 i10 i11 i12 i13 i14 i15 i16 i17 i18 i19 i20 i21 i22 i23 i24 i25 /N_BREAK=N. The results is: 1112241123312213222443444 1 2111141123112212312313334 1 2111141123112414212113344 2 2111241123112311124312231 1 2111341122112111412113341 1 2111341123312213312413334 1 2112141123212213212213334 1 2112211122212413421213221 1 211...

Hello, Following an earlier email ( http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-June/063010.html), we've published an initial version of the PNaCl bitcode reference manual online - http://www.chromium.org/nativeclient/pnacl/bitcode-abi. The PNaCl bitcode is a restricted subset of LLVM IR. The reference manual is quite terse, so for the bigger picture I'll repost links to the design

...in(i32 %argc, i8** %argv) nounwind { entry: %retval = alloca i32, align 4 %argc.addr = alloca i32, align 4 %argv.addr = alloca i8**, align 8 %szarray = alloca i64, align 8 %wfile = alloca %struct._IO_FILE*, align 8 %i = alloca i32, align 4 %rfile = alloca %struct._IO_FILE*, align 8 %i17 = alloca i32, align 4 %val = alloca i32, align 4 store i32 0, i32* %retval store i32 %argc, i32* %argc.addr, align 4 store i8** %argv, i8*** %argv.addr, align 8 %0 = load i32* %argc.addr, align 4 %cmp = icmp ne i32 %0, 2 br i1 %cmp, label %if.then, label %if.end if.then:...

...ttp://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#store-instruction . In general, > you have to be careful to avoid data races, but that might not apply to > your target. > > Are scalar integer types zero extended to the next multiple of 8 or to the >> next power of 2 greater than 7? For example, i17 => i24 or i17 => i32? >> > > Multiple of 8. > > I think this means truncating stores of vector types will introduce zero >> bits at the end of each element instead grouping all the zeros at the end. >> For example, <i6 63, i6 63> writes to sixteen bits as 0...

...ps.i14 = add <4 x i32> <i32 1, i32 1, i32 1, i32 1>, %bitcast6.i13 ; <<4 x i32>> [#uses=1] >> %not.i16 = xor <4 x i32> %bitcast6.i13, < i32 -1, i32 -1, i32 -1, i32 -1 > ; <<4 x i32>> [#uses=1] >> %andnps.i17 = add <4 x i32> <i32 1, i32 1, i32 1, i32 1>, %not.i16 ; <<4 x i32>> [#uses=1] >> %orps.i18 = or <4 x i32> %andnps.i17, %andps.i14 ; <<4 x i32>> [#uses=1] >> %bitcast17.i19 = bitcast <4 x i32> %orp...

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

...2.i50.i.i, align 2, !tbaa !5 %cmp5.3.i15.i.i.i = icmp eq i16 %102, 0 br i1 %cmp5.3.i15.i.i.i, label %for.inc.3.i18.i.i.i, label %if.then3.i.i.i for.inc.3.i18.i.i.i: ; preds = %for.inc.2.i16.i.i.i %103 = load i16* %incdec.ptr.3.i51.i.i, align 2, !tbaa !5 %cmp5.4.i17.i.i.i = icmp eq i16 %103, 0 br i1 %cmp5.4.i17.i.i.i, label %for.inc.4.i20.i.i.i, label %if.then3.i.i.i for.inc.4.i20.i.i.i: ; preds = %for.inc.3.i18.i.i.i %104 = load i16* %incdec.ptr.4.i52.i.i, align 2, !tbaa !5 %cmp5.5.i19.i.i.i = icmp eq i16 %104, 0 br i1 %c...