Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "hyojin".
2015 Aug 13
2
[LLVMdev] Improving loop vectorizer support for loops with a volatile iteration variable
...wering transformations that turn vectorizable loops into non-vectorizable loops?
3. How do we detect cases where transformations cause a negative answer to either of the above?
Now (2) is a subset of (1), but (1) applies as a general structural property to a much larger class of transformations. Hyojin has found, and proposed a fix for, two important instances of (1) by manual investigation, and I think we should move forward with reviewing those (the actual Phabricator differential did not cc llvm-commits, etc. and I've commented there asking her to open a new one).
Regarding a more-automat...
2015 Jul 16
2
[LLVMdev] Improving loop vectorizer support for loops with a volatile iteration variable
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at google.com>
> To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>
> Cc: "Hyojin Sung" <hsung at us.ibm.com>, llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
> Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 1:06:03 AM
> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Improving loop vectorizer support for loops
> with a volatile iteration variable
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 6:36 PM Hal Finkel < hfinkel at anl.gov >...
2015 Jul 16
2
[LLVMdev] Improving loop vectorizer support for loops with a volatile iteration variable
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at google.com>
> To: "Hyojin Sung" <hsung at us.ibm.com>, llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
> Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 7:34:54 PM
> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Improving loop vectorizer support for loops
> with a volatile iteration variable
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:55 PM Hyojin Sung < hsung at us.ibm.com &...
2015 Jul 15
5
[LLVMdev] Improving loop vectorizer support for loops with a volatile iteration variable
Hi all,
I would like to propose an improvement of the “almost dead” block
elimination in Transforms/Local.cpp so that it will preserve the canonical
loop form for loops with a volatile iteration variable.
*** Problem statement
Nested loops in LCALS Subset B (https://codesign.llnl.gov/LCALS.php) are
not vectorized with LLVM -O3 because the LLVM loop vectorizer fails the
test whether the loop
2015 Jul 16
4
[LLVMdev] Improving loop vectorizer support for loops with a volatile iteration variable
...; with a volatile iteration variable
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
>
> > > From: "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at google.com>
> >
>
> > > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>
> >
>
> > > Cc: "Hyojin Sung" <hsung at us.ibm.com>, llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
> >
>
> > > Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 1:06:03 AM
> >
>
> > > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Improving loop vectorizer support for
> > > loops
> > > with a volatile iteration variable...
2008 Feb 18
2
Huge number
Hi,
I'm trying to calculate p-value to findout definitely expressed genes
compare A to B situation.
I got this data(this is a part of data) from whole organism , and each
number means each expression values (that means, we could think 'a' gene
is 13 in A situation, and it turns 30 in B situation)
To findout probability, I'm going to use Audic - Claverie Method. ( The
significance