search for: hvjunk

...upper level application doesn’t handle the packet loss well, will this be the problem? Or the upper level application have very limited tolerance to packet loss(like RDP application, I guess if the packet loss go to certain threshold, the connection will be lost). > On 18 Jun 2017, at 9:25 PM, hvjunk <hvjunk at gmail.com> wrote: > > The only time I can think off, that you’ll *want* to use TCP, is when UDP doesn’t work through the firewalls/NATting. > >> On 18 Jun 2017, at 14:53 , Bright Zhao <startryst at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> If the concern is more a...

----- Original Message ----- From: "hvjunk" <hvjunk at gmail.com> To: "Adam Ru" <ad.ruckel at gmail.com> Cc: gluster-users at gluster.org Sent: Monday, June 5, 2017 9:29:03 PM Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Gluster and NFS-Ganesha - cluster is down after reboot Sorry, got sidetracked with invoicing etc. https://b...

Hi hvjunk, could you please tell me have you had time to check my previous post? Could you please send me mentioned link to your Gluster Ansible scripts? Thank you, Adam On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Adam Ru <ad.ruckel at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi hvjunk (Hi Hendrik), > > "centos-re...

...ster-ansibles/src/6df23803df43/ansible/files/?at=master> The .service files are the stuff going into SystemD, and they call the test-mounts.sh scripts. The playbook installing higher up in the directory > On 05 Jun 2017, at 17:45 , Adam Ru <ad.ruckel at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi hvjunk, > > could you please tell me have you had time to check my previous post? > > Could you please send me mentioned link to your Gluster Ansible scripts? > > Thank you, > > Adam > > > On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Adam Ru <ad.ruckel at gmail.com> wrote:...

> On Oct 13, 2023, at 2:55?PM, hvjunk <hvjunk at gmail.com> wrote: > > What I guess the OP "wants" is to say that version 9.5 will be supported for the next 3-5 years, and all the security patches be backported from versions 11,12,13,14,15 to 9.5.3-patch1234 etc. Since OpenSSH/etc. haven't changed the wire p...

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1585 hvjunk at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hvjunk at gmail.com --- Comment #16 from hvjunk at gmail.com --- ++1 This gets even more need...

...ither fix your network, or the upper level application, as TCP/IP already does retransmissions with packet losses, and since it’s just encapsulated over the vpn-tech-of-choice, it’s not the VPN-tech-of-choice that should retransmit, but the TCP/IP stack. > >> On 18 Jun 2017, at 9:25 PM, hvjunk <hvjunk at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> The only time I can think off, that you’ll *want* to use TCP, is when UDP doesn’t work through the firewalls/NATting. >> >>> On 18 Jun 2017, at 14:53 , Bright Zhao <startryst at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>...

This part I have to answer on-list: > On 29 Mar 2018, at 17:50 , al so <volkswak at gmail.com> wrote: > > automation refers to day to day vpn management from non-IT layman... not a geek running shell/ansible scrpits. Dear Also / Volk Swak TINC have it’s uses and place in the VPN environment. Perhaps you could/should consider https://pritunl.com/ <https://pritunl.com/> or

If the concern is more about the reliability instead of throughput, should I add TCPonly = yes in the host configuration to make the VPN runs on TCP?

Hi there, I'm in a situation where some of my clients have all these obscurity things with ssh, like putting it on a different port, or a different user to login for this specific host not mention several don't have proper DNS names and and and. Life is to short to debate it with the client so rather get in line, use ssh_config, and continue to serve the client. However, now I have the

hvjunk wrote this message on Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 23:12 +0200: > I've been battling similar issues, and the only methods I've found (with sftp) was to use > software like pureftd or crushftp (using crushftp lately as production) that does handle these > issues "out of the box" &...

Le Friday, 31 March 2023, 17:47:14 EDT John-Mark Gurney a ?crit : > hvjunk wrote this message on Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 23:12 +0200: > > I've been battling similar issues, and the only methods I've found (with sftp) was to use > > software like pureftd or crushftp (using crushftp lately as production) that does handle these > > issues "out of...

Q: What type of changes, "incompatibilities" do you see, or experience, that would require something like that? Tomcat: i't s a "platform" where newer technologies (ie. JDK version N+3) could introduce unexpected problems for business apps that runs on that platform to have security for a period. Postgresql: as new features (ie. logical replication, and partitioning)

Hello, Please excuse my (probably newbie) question, but: Since RouterOS, MikroTik's proprietary OS, is largely based on GNU/Linux, anyone knows a way to run tinc on a MikroTik device? This would be in order to make an (imposed, no choice given...) MikroTik device (say the B1100AHX4 router) to participate in a tinc mesh, in interoperation with GNU/Linux machines. Please see:

*hvjunk said:* > Get a RPi (or faster/cheaper/equivalent), and bridge it into the Mikrotik………. Unfortunately, I don't think this is an option (even if I may put there a full PC, not only a Raspberry Pi), for a few reasons: - what I'm trying to achieve is to substitute MikroTik's native L2...

> On 03 Apr 2023, at 15:38, Fran?ois Ouellet <franco at sol.mpact.tv> wrote: > > I'm using the internal-sftp server, because it's a chrooted setup. > Not sure this can easily be done with this setup Yes, I know it's not OpenSSH, I'm just a happy user, but seriously for this use case, consider CrushFTP, or ProFTPd for the opernsource with the sftp module

There is a program call sshpass that does just that On ubuntu/debian: apt install sshpass > On 01 Jan 2024, at 20:37, Chris Green <cl at isbd.net> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 01, 2024 at 06:34:01PM +0000, Chris Green wrote: >> Setting SSH_ASKPASS_REQUIRE=never in the environment on my xubuntu >> 23.10 system doesn't seem to work. I have set it:- >> >>

Hi there, I've asked this question to the BSD group too, but I'd like to know whether anybody else had similar experiences on Linux 2.6.20 etc.?? FreeBSD 6.2 Asterisk 1.4.5 (and 1.4.3 from ports) Sip phone - PBX(*) -IAX2-VROUTER(*)- SIP-Voip provider (SPA901 & SPA922 phones) We've see a situation where the IAX2 appears to "loose"/drop the voice data to be sent to

Goodday, Currently using tinc 1.0.24 on Debian 8.x, OVH datacentre, two servers same VRACK (ie. internal ethernet bridge/switched together). I’m wanting to get a remote server connected to both the two OVH servers for fail-over reasons, but having access via both to the shared vRack segment as a switch mode. Thereby Essentially I’m creating a ethernet loop… ----------------------vRack |

Hi, We need to limit concurrent sftp logins to one per user (because of bad client behaviour). Is there any way to achieve this I have overlooked? It seems it could be possible with pam_limits, if sftp sessions were recorded in utmp (a guess from what I found googling around). If I configure /etc/security/limits.conf with testuser hard maxlogins 1 and connect with ssh, and try a second