search for: hustmphrrr

...e I highlighted the line which I have question on. the signature of malloc is void *malloc(size_t size); is this suspiciously wrong that this builder assumes size_t is 32 bit int? will LLVM backend smart enough to link the right one, which in 64 bit system is 64 bit int? Thanks, Jason Hu https://hustmphrrr.github.io/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200415/d0f6f9a9/attachment-0001.html>

...This is puzzling. I am not sure why must a store command be expanded to a sequence of etractvalues then stores? Is there a way to turn off this particular optimization without turning off the whole optimization? Or am I looking at the wrong way to do this simple task? Thanks, Jason Hu https://hustmphrrr.github.io/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200412/81912338/attachment.html>