search for: huppmann

For those that like to assist in the testing of rsync, the CVS version now defaults to doing an incremental file-list scan when it is recursing through the directories. This avoids keeping the whole file list in memory, and allows the transfer to start working on changed files before it has completed the recursive scan of the sending side. The code appears to be working well so far, but there

Hi, since I'm using Posix ACLs under Linux (via xattr) for some time now I was looking for rsync ACL support (using it to do 1:1 backups via LVM snapshots to another machine). A quick Google search revealed that Buck Huppmann had developed such a patch against rsync-2.5.5. I've ported the patch to rsync 2.6.0 and 2.6.2 and told him but never got a response. http://www.saout.de/misc/rsync-2.6.2-acl.diff.bz2 Well, at least between two Linux machines it is working perfectly for me, also the Gentoo people are using th...

here (in keep_backup())? --- backup.c.orig Mon Dec 9 17:02:36 2002 +++ backup.c Mon Dec 9 17:03:50 2002 @@ -273,6 +273,7 @@ /* move to keep tree if a file */ if(!kept) { + make_bak_dir(fname,backup_dir); if (!robust_move (fname, keep_name)) rprintf(FERROR, "keep_backup failed %s -> %s : %s\n", fname, keep_name, strerror(errno)); this reconstructs parent

remember this? On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 11:23:59PM -0500, Christopher R. Hertel wrote: > The 'wins server' parameter will take a comma separated list of > addresses or > names, but at present it will only use the first. The code is there to > allow Samba to fail over to the second, etc. if connections to the first > start to time out (indicating that the first WINS server

Hello Eric, I am taking Buck and the rsync mailing list into the CC. Buck is the author of the rsync patch, he may know more on that problem. On Wednesday 02 April 2003 00:16, Eric Chen wrote: > From my understanding, the effecive rights mask 'limits the effective > rights granted to all groups and to named users', so if you getfacl on a > file, the group permissions will be

...st identical to what acl_to_text(3) produces, but with ID's added. The exact format used is documented in the file README.ACL inside the package. This approach is less powerful than NFSv4 ACLs, but good enough for POSIX ACL backups.) Best regards, Andreas Gruenbacher. REFERENCES [1] Buck Huppmann: patch: rsync-2.5.5: UNIX ACL support, <http://www.mail-archive.com/rsync@lists.samba.org/msg05573.html>. [2] Gary Fernandez: [PATCH] change rsync to print warning if ACL detected, <http://www.mail-archive.com/rsync@lists.samba.org/msg04988.html>. [3] General rsync ACL discussions,...

it seems that --enable-utmpx and friends have the effect of disabling the corresponding feature (i.e., #define-ing DISABLE_UTMPX etc.), which leads to the (perhaps not so) obvious breakage of UseLogin on Solaris etc. For the less anal (or reformed anal) configure-r who leaves these unspecified, everything is OK i'd suggest changes to configure.in, but i'm blissfully ignorant of autoconf.

this line seemed to have been dropped somewhere b/w 3.1 and 3.5 --- openssh-3.5p1/openbsd-compat/readpassphrase.c.orig Tue Sep 10 20:29:13 2002 +++ openssh-3.5p1/openbsd-compat/readpassphrase.c Tue Feb 4 08:30:06 2003 @@ -152,6 +152,7 @@ (void)sigaction(SIGTERM, &saveterm, NULL); (void)sigaction(SIGTSTP, &savetstp, NULL); (void)sigaction(SIGTTIN,

there's an unsupported, it-works-for-us patch that's seen a bit of testing on Solaris 2.6/8 and rudimentary testing on Linux with Andre- as G's ACL implementation. most of the code is ripped straight out of the samba 2.2.5 source tree; the rest of it is stuff that i don't expect anybody to ever seriously consider merging into the rsync tree and which i wouldn't defend against