search for: hunh

...trying > create a new Instruction thus: > > %3 = add nsw i32 %1, %2 ; <i16> [#uses=2] //Old Instruction > > Value* Op0 = I->getOperand(0); > Value* Op1 = I->getOperand(1); > Value* V0 = new Value(Type::getInt16Ty(Op0->getContext()), > Op0->getValueID()); Hunh, Value's constructor is protected. In any event, Value is pure base. Constructing one this way will never get you what you want. If the ValueID indicates an Instruction, go through Instruction to create one. > Value* V1 = new Value(Type::getInt16Ty(Op1->getContext()), > Op1->get...

...t;> >> %3 = add nsw i32 %1, %2 ; <i16> [#uses=2] //Old Instruction >> >> Value* Op0 = I->getOperand(0); >> Value* Op1 = I->getOperand(1); >> Value* V0 = new Value(Type::getInt16Ty(Op0->getContext()), >> Op0->getValueID()); >> > > Hunh, Value's constructor is protected. > > In any event, Value is pure base. Constructing one this way will never get > you what you want. If the ValueID indicates an Instruction, go through > Instruction to create one. > > > Value* V1 = new Value(Type::getInt16Ty(Op1->getC...

Hi, Nick, thanks for the reply. I still have a problem: I only need to "clone" an Instruction, changing its type. That is, I would like to keep all characteristics of the old Instruction and create a new one only with a different type. I am trying create a new Instruction thus: %3 = add nsw i32 %1, %2 ; <i16> [#uses=2] //Old Instruction Value* Op0 = I->getOperand(0); Value*

...end dog = Dog.find_first dog.name => "Buster" dog.class => Dog dog.fleas => [] # store the class animal_class = dog.class => Dog dog = animal_class.find_first dog.name => "Buster" dog.class => Dog dog.fleas => method_missing! # hunh? # but this works again dog = Dog.find_by_id(dog.id) dog.fleas => [] Is there some AR magic that gets broken by using a variable class name? Thanks! - Isaac -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachm...

...%3 = add nsw i32 %1, %2 ; <i16> [#uses=2] //Old Instruction > > Value* Op0 = I->getOperand(0); > Value* Op1 = I->getOperand(1); > Value* V0 = new Value(Type::getInt16Ty(Op0->getContext()), > Op0->getValueID()); > > > Hunh, Value's constructor is protected. > > In any event, Value is pure base. Constructing one this way will > never get you what you want. If the ValueID indicates an > Instruction, go through Instruction to create one. > > > Value* V1 = new Value(Type::getI...

...%1, %2 ; <i16> [#uses=2] //Old Instruction >>> >>> Value* Op0 = I->getOperand(0); >>> Value* Op1 = I->getOperand(1); >>> Value* V0 = new Value(Type::getInt16Ty(Op0->getContext()), >>> Op0->getValueID()); >>> >> >> Hunh, Value's constructor is protected. >> >> In any event, Value is pure base. Constructing one this way will never get >> you what you want. If the ValueID indicates an Instruction, go through >> Instruction to create one. >> >> >> Value* V1 = new Value(T...

yes, i've read the online docs and followed a link or two to find a simple way to do this, such as: http://sourceware.org/systemtap/wiki/SystemTapOnCentOS so, these days, is that the canonical way to download source rpms? now, note that i'm not arguing about whether this is a good idea. in my circumstances, i want the ability to just "yum download" source rpms so that i can

Hello, I am building a package to read in a pretty common atmospheric data format and create a SKEW-T, log p diagram (also very common for the atmospheric community). The problem is this: How should one address the (ASCII) data files so that the examples find them? I have read through the "Writing R Extensions" document and still have a problem. There seems to be some sort of