Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "hungoff".
2015 Oct 16
2
[RFC] Clean up the way we store optional Function data
Here is a WIP patch as promised:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D13829
It uses a hungoff uselist to store optional data as needed.
Some early objections from Duncan:
- An extra one-time malloc() is required to set personality functions.
- We get and set personality functions frequently. This patch introduces a level of indirection which slows the common case down.
Is this ov...
2015 Oct 21
2
[RFC] Clean up the way we store optional Function data
...at 5:56 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On 2015-Oct-16, at 13:54, Vedant Kumar <vsk at apple.com> wrote:
>>
>> Here is a WIP patch as promised:
>>
>> http://reviews.llvm.org/D13829
>>
>> It uses a hungoff uselist to store optional data as needed.
>>
>> Some early objections from Duncan:
>>
>> - An extra one-time malloc() is required to set personality functions.
>> - We get and set personality functions frequently. This patch introduces a level of indirection whic...
2015 Oct 12
2
[RFC] Clean up the way we store optional Function data
David Majnemer wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>
>
> > On 2015-Oct-12, at 10:41, Sanjoy Das
> <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com
> <mailto:sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com>> wrote:
> >
>