search for: humpf

On 24 July 2015 at 15:00, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > GCC seems to be stricter than Clang about the ordering of > __attribute__ (from _LIBUNWIND_EXPORT) and 'extern "C"'. Humpf, that seems to be an old thing. GCC 5.1 on my laptop cope with that just fine. :( thanks! --renato

Hi Marshall, I'm trying to compile the whole thing in one go by adding libcxx and libcxxabi into llvm/src/projects. The first stage obviously has to use the system compiler, which is GCC 4.8.2, but I'm getting an error on ARM: Unwind-EHABI.cpp:1000:47: error: expected unqualified-id before string constant _LIBUNWIND_EXPORT extern "C" _Unwind_Reason_Code with the caret

Hi Renato, On 24 July 2015 at 04:35, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > Unwind-EHABI.cpp:1000:47: error: expected unqualified-id before string constant > _LIBUNWIND_EXPORT extern "C" _Unwind_Reason_Code GCC seems to be stricter than Clang about the ordering of __attribute__ (from _LIBUNWIND_EXPORT) and 'extern "C"'. You can play around

...ato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 24 July 2015 at 15:00, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: >> GCC seems to be stricter than Clang about the ordering of >> __attribute__ (from _LIBUNWIND_EXPORT) and 'extern "C"'. > > Humpf, that seems to be an old thing. GCC 5.1 on my laptop cope with > that just fine. :( That's weird. My gcc 5.2 rejects it. Don't think I've got a 5.1 hanging around any more. Tim.

Chris Wright wrote: >* Zachary Amsden (zach@vmware.com) wrote: > > >>Does Xen assume page aligned descriptor tables? I assume from this >> >> > >Yes. > > > >>patch and snippets I have gathered from others, that is a yes, and other >>things here imply that DT pages are not shadowed. If so, Xen itself >>must have live segments

Chris Wright wrote: >* Zachary Amsden (zach@vmware.com) wrote: > > >>Does Xen assume page aligned descriptor tables? I assume from this >> >> > >Yes. > > > >>patch and snippets I have gathered from others, that is a yes, and other >>things here imply that DT pages are not shadowed. If so, Xen itself >>must have live segments

Hi, we are currently considering different options for rolling out a large scale IP PBX to handle around 3,000 + concurrent calls. Can this be done with Asterisk? Has it been done before? I really would like an input on this. Thanks! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: