Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "huger".
Did you mean:
huge
1999 Nov 23
0
DoS with sysklogd, glibc (Caldera) (fwd)
Hi,
This advisory has a bit more than the Red Hat one....
Roger.
----- Forwarded message from Alfred Huger -----
>>From owner-bugtraq@SECURITYFOCUS.COM Mon Nov 22 18:49:41 1999
Approved-By: aleph1@SECURITYFOCUS.COM
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9911220906250.11753-100000@www.securityfocus.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 09:08:08 -0800
X-Reply-To: Alfred Huger <ah@SECURITYFOCUS.COM>...
1997 Feb 04
0
In regards to the Linux ''Bliss'' Virus.
...You can
obtain a copy at:
ftp://ftp.secnet.com/pub/tools/abliss.tar.gz
[mod: deleted "have" between "lack" and "md5". What''s wrong with
"cat /tmp/.bliss"? --rew]
/*************************************************************************
Alfred Huger Phone: 403.262.9211
Secure Networks Inc. Fax: 403.262.9221
"Sit down before facts as a little child , be prepared to give up every
preconcieved notion, follow humbly wherever and whatever abysses nature
leads, or you...
2005 Oct 10
1
Re: About blazer, powermust and mustek
Arnaud Quette wrote:
> Anyhow, I would more see this as a merge of all these drivers, with
> some autodetection or flag/param to switch the mfr/model and maybe
> capabilities... Whatever the driver name is, a good thing would be the
> name of the protocol or something generic enough, though powermust is
> fine.
Ok, I made some minor changes to powermust, to make it less
2013 Oct 28
1
[LLVMdev] Interfacing llvm with a precise, relocating GC
On 10/26/13 7:40 AM, Filip Pizlo wrote:
> You can implement a copying GC (what the kids these days call
> relocating) without accurate roots.
I use "relocating" to brush over the distinction between "copying" and
"compacting" collectors. For the purposes of our discussions, the two
are interchangeable though.
> Why aren't you just using the well-known
2017 Mar 03
2
Optionally using value numbering in Simplify*
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Friedman, Eli <efriedma at codeaurora.org>
wrote:
On 3/3/2017 11:51 AM, Daniel Berlin via llvm-dev wrote:
So i have a testcase (see PR31792, and cond_br2.llin GVN) that current GVN
can simplify because it replaces instructions as it goes. It's an example
of a larger issue that pops up quite a lot
I would appreciate thoughts on what to do about it
it
1997 Apr 22
1
SNI-12: BIND Vulnerabilities and Solutions (fwd)
...Todd Miller <millert@openbsd.org>
Allen Briggs <briggs@openbsd.org>
Further attributions:
AUSCERT <auscert@auscert.org.au>
David Sacerdote <davids@secnet.com>
Oliver Friedrichs <oliver@secnet.com>
Alfred Huger <ahuger@secnet.com>
Additional Information:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[1] Vixie P. , "DNS and BIND security issues".
This was originally published in the proceedings of the
5th USENIX Security Symposium and its included in the BIND
distribution under the doc/mi...