search for: huetmannsberger

...e features of samba-3.0.10 for a samba PDC which is why I am not happy about downgrading. But the database is the main tool for the film festival I work for, so it must work. HAs anyone else found a solution to ACCESS2000 sharing problems. Any help would be appreciated. Many thanks, Peter Huetmannsberger, RHCE

...re -o username=CENTRUM+username results in an access denied, where it had worked before. I am pretty desperate at this point having spent all day trying to find the problem, and short of downgrading and oping this would work, I can't find the problem. Many thanks for your help. Peter Huetmannsberger

...o the default qdisc and have no guaranteed bandwidth. 1:20 is only for testing purposes and nothing goes over that one. Any idea where I could be wrong? I am sure a lot of this is redundant, but as I said, I have only just started with this particular subject. Many thanks in advance Peter Huetmannsberger Admin Center for Contemporary Art, Linz _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hi folks, I have the two firewalls (Slackware current) in differnt cities connected via OpenVPN. I can ping the network behind server firewall from client firewall server. But how to route/iptable network traffic from the network behind client firewall to see the netwrok behind server firewall? Thank you Remus

Hi I am using samba 3.0.7-2 on my FC1 box as a PDC with a backend of tdbsam and I would like to set up a BDC for the domain as well. The big samba book tells me it can be done with tdbsam, but is wary about the machine passwords changing, thus breaking the replication done with rsync. I don't have the time right now to get into an ldap backend, so I was wondering if there is a way to

Hi again, sorry to be such a bother. I got my setup to work with kernel 2.6.8.1, however the two machines where I need to implement the shaping are running a 2.4.27 kernel. I have applied the infamous June patch (htbfair.diff) already, and recompiled the modules. And I am using the tc that comes with htb3.6-020525.tgz. While I can see the packets going into the right class, it does not

Hi, i''ve following problem. One of our gateway router, which connects some of our customers should have bandwith limit. So customer A with IP XX should have 2 Mbit, customer B with IP YY should have 10 Mbit. There is no need of borrowing bandwith so no fairness needed. My simple question: with which technique should I manage this shaping? Or is there any existing project which

Hi! I have a setup where I want to prefer traffic on one port (for testing purposes I used port 22) my setup is : tc qdisc add dev eth3 root handle 1: htb default 30 tc class add dev eth3 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 96mbit burst 15k tc class add dev eth3 parent 1: classid 1:7 htb rate 2mbit burst 15k tc class add dev eth3 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 96mbit burst 15k tc class add dev

Hi, I have a smb pdc running which works quite well so far, and would like to know if this feature is possible. I have two locations, and I want all users to authenticate on Machine A. Howver there are some users that are closer to machine B, and I would like to be able to have the homes of those users on machine B rather than machine A (they should authenticate on machine A anyway). Is this

I''ve made some tests... eth2 is my internal interface, LAN is connected here. Before I had IMQ device in AB mode... PREROUTING [A]fter NAT, POSTROUTING [B]efore NAT. I want the same situation on ifb. I do this in this way: --- # incoming traffic here from LAN is before NAT tc qdisc add dev eth2 handle ffff: ingress # outcoming traffic here from WAN is after NAT tc qdisc add dev eth2

Hi, I want to use inverted matches with tc-filter. I tried to invert the matches with a "!", but this doesn''t seem to be the correct syntax. The following rules don''t work: ---------------------------snip----------------------------------------- $TC filter $ACTION dev $DEV protocol ip parent 1:0 u32 match ip src ${NETWORK[$i]} !match ip dst 192.168.0.0/24 flowid

Hi! Soryr about being a whiner, not enough sleep and too much frustration don''t become too well. In any case, I have succeeded with the shaping now. The problem seems to have been twofold. First of all I had the rate too high for the actual throughput. We have a 1mbit connection to the internet, and after lowering the rate of the parent to 800kbit, and sharing that between the

Hi, I am still struggling with details on this setup. I have the shaping work well with some applications and not with others. Here''s what I have: #!/bin/bash tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 20 tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 800kbit burst 15k tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 650kbit ceil 110kbps burst 15k prio