search for: hub2

...uot;Got ADD_EDGE from nodeX (192.168.0.1 port 655) which does not match existing entry" and it turns out that the mismatches were cuased by different weight received by add_edge_h(). This network is consists of ~4 hub nodes and 50+ leaf nodes. Sample hub config: Name = hub1 ConnectTo = hub2 ConnectTo = hub3 ConnectTo = hub4 Leaf looks like: Name = node1 ConnectTo = hub1 ConnectTo = hub2 ConnectTo = hub3 ConnectTo = hub4 Back to the days of pure 1.0.33 nodes, if the network suddenly fails(users will see tincd CPU usage goes 50%+ and unable to get ping response...

...sh. Certain nodes were not contactable. I re-generated my rsa-keys, and checked my configuration. My vpn uses the following in tinc.conf, as I am routing both ipv4 and v6. === name = node1 mode = switch AddressFamily = any PMTU = 1280 PMTUDiscovery = yes TCPonly = no ConnectTo = hub1 ConnectTo = hub2 ConnectTo = hub3 === My VPN has some hosts called by nodex. These nodes are dynamic-ip, and set to contact (connectTo) the hubs when they bring up their tincd. The hubx nodes are fixed-ip, and are connected to each other in a full mesh. With TCPonly = no, the vpn would only connect to ONE of th...

All, The attached script is causing the following error message ... bash-3.00# ./zmon_bug.d dtrace: error on enabled probe ID 2 (ID 4394: fbt:genunix:copen:entry): invalid address (0xfd91747f) in predicate at DIF offset 120 dtrace: error on enabled probe ID 2 (ID 4394: fbt:genunix:copen:entry): invalid address (0xfef81a3f) in predicate at DIF offset 120 Any ideas? thxs Joe --

...0 - .100 How can I say the Client4s/Server that the one server is for the first clients and the other for the others??? Because when I turn on the Linux Server, all Clients in the Room get the IP from it. Picture: 192.168.1.3-------------- 192.168.5.2 | Linux Server---------HUB1----------HUB2 | | | | | Gateway | | Client1, ...-14 | | NT Server 192.168.1.2 Got me? Then help me please :) Thanks! Andreas Return-Path: <andreas.kauffmann@tzdan.de> Delive...