Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "html_mono".
2004 Oct 11
3
[LLVMdev] Re: [llvm-commits] CVS: */Makefile.am
On Sun, 2004-10-10, Misha Brukman asked "Why can't we use wildcards
instead of listing all the sources" and then wrote in response to my
reply:
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 04:40:48PM -0700, Reid Spencer wrote:
> > http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_mono/automake.html#wildcards
> >
> > is your answer.
>
> I think their "answer" is lame; we have already sacrificed portability
> because we are using enough of gmake-only functionality because we
> cannot depend on the system "make" being anything useful, y...
2004 Oct 11
0
[LLVMdev] Re: [llvm-commits] CVS: */Makefile.am
...004-10-10, Misha Brukman asked "Why can't we use wildcards
> instead of listing all the sources" and then wrote in response to my
> reply:
>
>>On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 04:40:48PM -0700, Reid Spencer wrote:
>>
>>>http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_mono/automake.html#wildcards
>>>
>>>is your answer.
>>
>>I think their "answer" is lame; we have already sacrificed portability
>>because we are using enough of gmake-only functionality because we
>>cannot depend on the system "make" being an...
2006 Apr 20
3
[LLVMdev] Oddity in StackerParser.y.
Hi,
$ g -1 '^Module' StackerParser.y
/* A module is just a DefinitionList */
Module : { SCI->handle_module_start( ); }
DefinitionList { $$ = SCI->handle_module_end( $2 ); } ;
$
It's been years since I was heavily into yacc, but shouldn't it be
s/$2/$1/?
Cheers,
Ralph.
2006 Apr 20
0
[LLVMdev] Oddity in StackerParser.y.
No, $2 is correct. The { } code block before DefinitionList is counted
(or more precisely, the empty sequence of terminals preceding it is
counted).
Ralph Corderoy wrote:
>Hi,
>
> $ g -1 '^Module' StackerParser.y
> /* A module is just a DefinitionList */
> Module : { SCI->handle_module_start( ); }
> DefinitionList { $$ =
2004 Oct 11
2
[LLVMdev] Re: [llvm-commits] CVS: */Makefile.am
..."Why can't we use wildcards
> > instead of listing all the sources" and then wrote in response to my
> > reply:
> >
> >>On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 04:40:48PM -0700, Reid Spencer wrote:
> >>
> >>>http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_mono/automake.html#wildcards
> >>>
> >>>is your answer.
> >>
> >>I think their "answer" is lame; we have already sacrificed portability
> >>because we are using enough of gmake-only functionality because we
> >>cannot depend on the sy...