search for: hting

Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "hting".

Did you mean: sting
2009 Aug 28
2
[LLVMdev] [Cygwin] llvm-gcc-4 bug - popcountsi2.o assertion ""V == V2 && "Didn't find key?""
...gt; > "/home/ang/svn/llvm-coff/ > > This is familiar but I cannot remember whether it got fixed or not now. I > > thought llvm-gcc worked with llvm some months ago. > > Sorry to be so lame, > This is usual indication that LLVM is miscompiled. I was hurt by the > same hting preparing the prerelease binaries for mingw32 as well. The > solutions were: > - Switch to never gcc > - Compile stuff in debug mode :( Hi Anton, Thanks for the advice, I will start from scratch again tomorrow :) Aaron -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scru...
2010 Aug 12
2
MSN wtf?
Well I've dabbled with Wine on and off for about a year and quite frankly, I've never gotten Wine to work... in fact I've never gotten Wine to do anything--I don't know why I bother, I guess because sometimes my head inflates, and I just need Wine to tell me that yes tehre are some htings in life I can't have. So I went here: http://wiki.winehq.org/MSN_Messenger_webcam_support Didn't work... cashed. So I used wine tricks and installed a bunch of crap Google suggested. Now I get this: Code: genius at k-laptop:~/.wine/drive_c/Program Files/MSN Messenger$ export WINEPRE...
2009 Aug 28
0
[LLVMdev] [Cygwin] llvm-gcc-4 bug - popcountsi2.o assertion ""V == V2 && "Didn't find key?""
...ey?"" failed: file > "/home/ang/svn/llvm-coff/ > This isĀ familiarĀ but I cannot remember whether it got fixed or not now. I > thought llvm-gcc worked with llvm some months ago. > Sorry to be so lame, This is usual indication that LLVM is miscompiled. I was hurt by the same hting preparing the prerelease binaries for mingw32 as well. The solutions were: - Switch to never gcc - Compile stuff in debug mode :( -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
2009 Aug 29
0
[LLVMdev] [Cygwin] llvm-gcc-4 bug - popcountsi2.o assertion ""V == V2 && "Didn't find key?""
...llvm-coff/ >> > This is familiar but I cannot remember whether it got fixed or not now. >> I >> > thought llvm-gcc worked with llvm some months ago. >> > Sorry to be so lame, >> This is usual indication that LLVM is miscompiled. I was hurt by the >> same hting preparing the prerelease binaries for mingw32 as well. The >> solutions were: >> - Switch to never gcc >> - Compile stuff in debug mode :( > > > Hi Anton, > > Thanks for the advice, I will start from scratch again tomorrow :) > > Aaron > Anton, Did a non...
2009 Aug 28
2
[LLVMdev] [Cygwin] llvm-gcc-4 bug - popcountsi2.o assertion ""V == V2 && "Didn't find key?""
/home/ang/build/llvm-gcc-coff/./gcc/xgcc -B/home/ang/build/llvm-gcc-coff/./gcc/ -B/home/ang/llvm-gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/bin/ -B/home/ang/llvm-gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/lib / -isystem /home/ang/llvm-gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/include -isystem /home/ang/llvm-gcc /i686-pc-cygwin/sys-include -O2 -I/home/ang/svn/llvm-gcc-coff/gcc/../winsup/w32 api/include -O2 -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings
2011 Mar 05
1
IPTABLES rule for separating users
I have an OpenWrt 10.03 router [ IP: 192.168.1.1 ], and it has a DHCP server pool: 192.168.1.0/24 - clients are using it through wireless/wired connection. Ok! Here's the catch: I need to separate the users from each other. How i need to do it: by IPTABLES rule [ /etc/firewall.user ]. Ok! "Loud thinking": So i need a rule something like this [on the OpenWrt router]: - DROP
2005 Mar 11
13
Vonage a provider?
I am new to the mailing list, but I am very interested in running my small home business office phone system using Asterisk. However, Broadvoice, a VoIP provider of choice based on my research, is not available in my area. I currently use Vonage VoIP. Their website mentions nothing about being able to link to Asterisk. I was wondering if any US subscribers have been able to configure Vonage
2011 Jan 07
18
Exactly how do people replace include with parametrised classes?
Hi list, Reading the thread "can a class require an other class?" it''s been mentioned that perhaps one way forward for the Puppet language is to phase out the include keyword in favour of parametrised classes. I''m thinking of my Puppet and the several levels of include chaining I use and I''m wondering how on earth that''d be possible. Maybe