Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "htb_classify".
2004 Sep 09
0
Setting priority in userspace gets ignored
...ng traffic to the class 1:10 should set the
priority to 65546,
MAJOR in the high bits and MINOR in the low bits. I have the correct
capability to set this
out of the 0-7 range and the setsockopt returns no error.
The problem I have is that the skb->priority field is not set when I get
to the htb_classify function
via the htb_enqueue function. That is that the skb->sk and skb->priority
fields are both zero.
As a result control falls through until the default class is selected.
The small test I am using is that
my application simply sets all of the outgoing data to a single priority.
And it i...
2004 Jun 18
1
Help:how to generate different packets?souce code explanation?
Hi,All
I setup traffic control configuration with HTB this way:
1: root HTB qdisc
|
1:1 HTB class rate 1024kbit
|
/-----+-----+-----+------+-----\
1:10 1:20 1:30 1:40 1:50 1:60
EF AF41 AF31 AF21 AF11 BE
and alloct different bandwidth to these PHBs(queues).So which tool would I use to generate these packets at the same to for
2006 Jan 26
0
Profiling hotspots in my tc filter ruleset
...sky2_rx_add
2858 sch_htb.ko htb_enqueue
3983 bridge.ko br_handle_frame
4796 bridge.ko br_nf_pre_routing
7047 bridge.ko br_nf_post_routing
8158 sky2.ko sky2_xmit_frame
9519 sch_htb.ko htb_classify
9910 sch_htb.ko htb_dequeue
9916 ip_tables.ko ipt_do_table
9944 bridge.ko br_fdb_update
10094 bridge.ko __br_fdb_get
14446 sky2.ko sky2_intr
15323 sky2.ko sky2_tx_complete
17745 ebt_ip....
2006 Aug 02
10
[PATCH 0/6] htb: cleanup
The HTB scheduler code is a mess, this patch set does some basic
house cleaning. The first four should cause no code change, but the
last two need more testing.
--
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
"And in the Packet there writ down that doome"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
2006 May 19
25
iptables CLASSIFY and MARK not working?
I have to match my packets based on MAC address, which I cannot do in
the POSTROUTING chain, so I do it in PREROUTING using MARK. Then, I
match on the MARK in the POSTROUTING chain to do a CLASSIFY. But this
does not seem to work:
wireless-r1 bwlimit # iptables -L -v -n -t mangle
Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 3353K packets, 941M bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source