Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "hsung".
Did you mean:
hrung
2015 Jul 16
2
[LLVMdev] Improving loop vectorizer support for loops with a volatile iteration variable
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at google.com>
> To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>
> Cc: "Hyojin Sung" <hsung at us.ibm.com>, llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
> Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 1:06:03 AM
> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Improving loop vectorizer support for loops
> with a volatile iteration variable
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 6:36 PM Hal Finkel < hfinkel at anl.gov > wrote:
> > >...
2015 Jul 16
2
[LLVMdev] Improving loop vectorizer support for loops with a volatile iteration variable
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at google.com>
> To: "Hyojin Sung" <hsung at us.ibm.com>, llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
> Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 7:34:54 PM
> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Improving loop vectorizer support for loops
> with a volatile iteration variable
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:55 PM Hyojin Sung < hsung at us.ibm.com >
> wrote:
>...
2015 Jul 16
4
[LLVMdev] Improving loop vectorizer support for loops with a volatile iteration variable
...ation variable
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
>
> > > From: "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at google.com>
> >
>
> > > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>
> >
>
> > > Cc: "Hyojin Sung" <hsung at us.ibm.com>, llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
> >
>
> > > Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 1:06:03 AM
> >
>
> > > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Improving loop vectorizer support for
> > > loops
> > > with a volatile iteration variable
> >
>
&g...
2015 Aug 13
2
[LLVMdev] Improving loop vectorizer support for loops with a volatile iteration variable
...vectorizer will or will not vectorize will likely change much more over time), but detecting problems here is certainly also very important.
Thanks again,
Hal
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gerolf Hoflehner" <ghoflehner at apple.com>
> To: "Hyojin Sung" <hsung at us.ibm.com>
> Cc: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>, llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu, llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu
> Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2015 11:08:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Improving loop vectorizer support for loops with a volatile iteration variable
>
>...
2015 Jul 15
5
[LLVMdev] Improving loop vectorizer support for loops with a volatile iteration variable
Hi all,
I would like to propose an improvement of the “almost dead” block
elimination in Transforms/Local.cpp so that it will preserve the canonical
loop form for loops with a volatile iteration variable.
*** Problem statement
Nested loops in LCALS Subset B (https://codesign.llnl.gov/LCALS.php) are
not vectorized with LLVM -O3 because the LLVM loop vectorizer fails the
test whether the loop