search for: hs12

...(flat file, LDAP, > whatever) or you use the ${readsocket?} feature of Exim to talk to > dovecot. The readsocket trick doesn't seem to work anymore. Using $ socat STDIO UNIX:/run/dovecot/auth-master < VERSION 1 1 < SPID 16290 > VERSION 1 1 > USER 42 hs12 service=imap < USER 1 hs12 uid=500 gid=500 home=/var/vmail/home/h/hs12 (the spaces are tabs). But using Exim exim -be '${readsocket{/run/dovecot/auth-userdb}{VERSION\t1\t1\nUSER\t1\hs12\tservice=imap\n}}' does not work. Exim closes the sending side right after the final...

...he ${readsocket?} feature of Exim to talk to > > dovecot. > > The readsocket trick doesn't seem to work anymore. > > Using > $ socat STDIO UNIX:/run/dovecot/auth-master > < VERSION 1 1 > < SPID 16290 > > VERSION 1 1 > > USER 42 hs12 service=imap > < USER 1 hs12 uid=500 gid=500 home=/var/vmail/home/h/hs12 > > (the spaces are tabs). > > But using Exim > > exim -be '${readsocket{/run/dovecot/auth-userdb}{VERSION\t1\t1\ > nUSER\t1\hs12\tservice=imap\n}}' > > does not work. Exi...

Hi Heiko, Here is the router: virtual_aliases: driver = redirect debug_print = "R: Check address using virtual_aliases for $local_part@$domain" allow_fail allow_defer hide data = CHECK_VIRTUAL_ALIASES user = vmail group = mail local_user: debug_print = "R: local_user for $local_part@$domain" driver = accept

...e tls_* options. If I use an ldap:// URI and switch on TLS using tls=yes it works as expected. But I do not see any reason why LDAPS should not read the tls_* settings. This small patch solved it for me --- dovecot-2.2.9/src/auth/db-ldap.c 2013-11-24 14:37:39.000000000 +0100 +++ dovecot-2.2.9.hs12/src/auth/db-ldap.c 2015-10-08 21:24:47.051446465 +0200 @@ -1043,7 +1043,7 @@ static void db_ldap_set_tls_options(struct ldap_connection *conn) { - if (!conn->set.tls) + if (!(conn->set.tls || strncmp(conn->set.uris, "ldaps:", 6) == 0)) return...

...switch on TLS using tls=yes it works as expected. > > But I do not see any reason why LDAPS should not read the tls_* > settings. I guess. > This small patch solved it for me > > --- dovecot-2.2.9/src/auth/db-ldap.c 2013-11-24 14:37:39.000000000 +0100 > +++ dovecot-2.2.9.hs12/src/auth/db-ldap.c 2015-10-08 21:24:47.051446465 +0200 > @@ -1043,7 +1043,7 @@ > > static void db_ldap_set_tls_options(struct ldap_connection *conn) > { > - if (!conn->set.tls) > + if (!(conn->set.tls || strncmp(conn->set.uris, "ldaps:", 6) ==...

...king file (or device). Using Rsync now on these smaller files I circumvented the above mentioned issues (be they real or just a result of my stupidity). Maybe you find bmapfs useful for other scenarios too. I'd be happy if you provide me feedback of *any* kind. https://gitea.schlittermann.de/hs12/bmapfs Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Gr??e aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} - gnupg encrypted messages are welcome ----------...

Is there a tool equivalent to the system "passwd" command (or maybe "adduser" or "useradd") that can support a passwd-file by setting a password, encrypting it with the salted MD5 scheme? The system "passwd" command doesn't have an option to "do it to this alternate file instead of /etc/shadow".

...f yes, did it work for you (STARTTLS triggers the problem)? If not, which other (Perl) library do you use? Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Gr??e aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann HS12-RIPE ----------------------------------------- gnupg encrypted messages are welcome - key ID: 48D0359B --------------- gnupg fingerprint: 3061 CFBF 2D88 F034 E8D2 7E92 EE4E AC98 48D0 359B - -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: ap...

...# sieve fileinto "a\\2eb"; works. But the user won't understand this. Any ideas? Best regards from Dresden/Germany Viele Gr??e aus Dresden Heiko Schlittermann -- SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support - Heiko Schlittermann HS12-RIPE ----------------------------------------- gnupg encrypted messages are welcome - key ID: 48D0359B --------------- gnupg fingerprint: 3061 CFBF 2D88 F034 E8D2 7E92 EE4E AC98 48D0 359B - -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: ap...

Hi, I use Postfix & Dovecot with TLS / SSL - it authenticates / works fine - except I'm always getting this ugly SSL cert warning messages mit MTAs. It says that the following: "You have attempted to establish a connection with "server". However, the security certificate presented belongs to "*.server". It is possible, though unlikely, that someone may be

Hello, Is there any directive in Dovecot similar to 'imap_admins' of Cyrus? I plan to migrate from Cyrus to Dovecot. But I need a admin user which is able to obtain information about the quotas of common users. Thank you. -- []'s Thiago Henrique Network Administration Digirati Networks K8 Networks

Hello, My mail system is build with postfix, dovecot and roundcube. In first time users can view and "manage" their mail only on the webmail. So this one (webmail) use IMAP (no tls/ssl at all) authentication to give access to users maildir. This connection is made on the 'loopback' interface and use PLAIN method. This works fine (configuration below without ssl parameters).

Hi, Using 2.2.9 (ubuntu 14.04 LTS) and sending the following command, the server crashes when I try to delete an annotation: ? login ? C: 2 setannotation Trash "/vendor/cmu/cyrus-imapd/expire" ("value.shared" NIL) Apr 27 09:29:16 backend1 dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=<heiko>, method=PLAIN, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, mpid=6651, secured Apr 27 09:29:16 backend1

I'm setting up a Postfix and Dovecot combination. What I want to do is have a user database that (1) is not running from some engine (so not LDAP or SQL or such) ... and (2) is completely disassociated from system users (e.g. most email users are not in /etc/passwd and most /etc/passwd users are not email users). Ideal would be a one-file solution, which can be managed by text editing or