Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "hrf".
Did you mean:
href
2005 Feb 07
1
Incorrect behavior for ordering timepoints in "reshape" (PR#7669)
...timepoints that reshape uses (in direction="long") are negative or
fractional, the time label is assigned incorrectly. It is easier to give an
example than to describe the problem abstractly:
Assume you have a data.frame header with values related to peri-stimulus time
like this:
"HRF -5" "HRF -2.5" "HRF 0" "HRF 2.5" ... "HRF 10"
And you give reshape a split argument of a space " ".
Then the labels will be assigned strangely, based on alphabetical ordering. So
the above list order maps to:
-2.5, -5, 0, 10, ... 2.5
Items...
2015 Jan 07
3
[LLVMdev] [RFC][PATCH][OPENCL] synchronization scopes redux
...i.e., all
threads running on all agents. So it is not okay for the compiler to
"promote" the scope in just one kernel unless it has access to the
entire application; the result is undefined. This is true for OpenCL
source as well as HSAIL target. This may change in the near furture:
HRF-Relaxed: Adapting HRF to the complexities of industrial
heterogeneous memory models
http://benedictgaster.org/?page_id=278
But even then, it will be difficult to say if the same models can be
applied to heterogeneous systems that don't resemble OpenCL or HSAIL.
> I'd be interested in...
2019 Apr 27
1
Can't find SRPMS for CentOS
Hi,
I have to rebuild a handful of CentOS packages for some extra
functionality. So I setup a build environment in a virtual machine, and
right now I'm trying to find the SRPMS. I enabled the repositories
listed in /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Sources.repo and then tried this:
[microlinux at buildbox:~] $ yumdownloader --source ark
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks, priorities
Enabling
2015 Jan 06
3
[LLVMdev] [RFC][PATCH][OPENCL] synchronization scopes redux
On 1/6/2015 1:01 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 10:51 PM, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com
> <mailto:resistor at mac.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Sameer,
>
> > On Jan 5, 2015, at 4:51 AM, Sahasrabuddhe, Sameer
> <Sameer.Sahasrabuddhe at amd.com
> <mailto:Sameer.Sahasrabuddhe at amd.com>> wrote:
> >