Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "hrev53313".
2019 Aug 01
1
Re: [nbdkit PATCH 4/8] Revert "RHEL 5: Define O_CLOEXEC and SOCK_CLOEXEC."
...nes wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 10:06:01AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> As far as I can see Haiku (hrev52698) has O_CLOEXEC but NOT
>> SOCK_CLOEXEC. As this version is a little old I'll do an update and
>> see if newer versions support it.
>
> I'm on hrev53313+1 which also doesn't appear to have SOCK_CLOEXEC (nor
> does it have accept4).
Ouch. Then I'm seriously thinking of a followup patch which either
forces SERIALIZE_ALL_REQUESTS on all plugins when SOCK_CLOEXEC is
missing, or which adds a bool to the plugin interface that the plugin
sets...
2019 Aug 01
2
Re: [nbdkit PATCH 4/8] Revert "RHEL 5: Define O_CLOEXEC and SOCK_CLOEXEC."
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 04:31:32PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> This reverts commit 25206df20275aeff346d9b86adf5e9be99cc9e43.
>
> An upcoming patch wants to ensure no leaked fds from the server to a
> child process. POSIX has required O_CLOEXEC since 2008, and although
> current POSIX doesn't yet specify full atomic interfaces everywhere
> such as SOCK_CLOEXEC, it does have
2019 Aug 01
0
Re: [nbdkit PATCH 4/8] Revert "RHEL 5: Define O_CLOEXEC and SOCK_CLOEXEC."
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 10:06:01AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> As far as I can see Haiku (hrev52698) has O_CLOEXEC but NOT
> SOCK_CLOEXEC. As this version is a little old I'll do an update and
> see if newer versions support it.
I'm on hrev53313+1 which also doesn't appear to have SOCK_CLOEXEC (nor
does it have accept4).
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines....