Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "hprscharmaine".
2017 Nov 29
2
sendmail getting domain\user as email userId
...probably due to "The owner of
the rcfile was not the recipient or root" (from procmail manpage). Note that mail delivery
worked OK when the user was in /etc/passwd. Currently, mail is not getting delivered the the
Maildir as .procmailrc specifies, but rather it is sent to /var/spool/mail/HPRScharmaine, so it
is obviously construction a mbox name based on the winbind returned ID.
Regarding this issue, On Thu Jul 21 04:02 Rowland penny wrote:
> There is another line, which works on a domain member:
>...
2017 Nov 30
0
sendmail getting domain\user as email userId
...on below, in my specific case procmail does not see HPRS\charmaine as the
actual owner 'charmaine' and I get a "Suspicious rcfile "/home/HPRS/charmaine/.procmailrc"
message in maillog and the mail does not get delivered to her $HOME/Maildir file, but rather to
/var/spool/mail/HPRScharmaine.
Per the procmail man page, this error is because, "The owner of the rcfile was not the
recipient or root, ... ". My work-around was to change the ownership of the .procmailrc file
to root since that seemed acceptable to procmail. This worked and mail was then delivered.
Comments:
This...
2017 Nov 30
2
sendmail getting domain\user as email userId
...ific case procmail does not see HPRS\charmaine as the actual
> owner 'charmaine' and I get a "Suspicious rcfile
> "/home/HPRS/charmaine/.procmailrc" message in maillog and the mail
> does not get delivered to her $HOME/Maildir file, but rather
> to /var/spool/mail/HPRScharmaine.
>
> Per the procmail man page, this error is because, "The owner of the
> rcfile was not the recipient or root, ... ". My work-around was to
> change the ownership of the .procmailrc file to root since that
> seemed acceptable to procmail. This worked and mail was then
&g...
2017 Dec 01
2
sendmail getting domain\user as email userId
On Fri, 01 Dec 2017 03:47:26 -0500
Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
> Yeah, I saw that, and I read the developer's comment. Frankly, I
> don't get it. Seems to me winbind behaviour should be the same, AD/DC
> or domain member. And it should deliver to programs the id they
> expect (w/o domain name), regardless of the use being made. I don't