Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "hpd_pending".
2024 May 28
1
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: don't attempt to schedule hpd_work on headless cards
...sk(&nv_connector->base);
> unsigned long flags;
>
> + if (drm->headless)
> + return;
> +
You shouldn't need this change, the function can't be called if there's
no display.
> spin_lock_irqsave(&drm->hpd_lock, flags);
> if (!(drm->hpd_pending & mask)) {
> nv_connector->hpd_pending |= bits;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c
> index aed5d5b51b43..1961ef665e97 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/...
2024 Jun 11
0
[PATCH v2] drm/nouveau: don't attempt to schedule hpd_work on headless cards
...rivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c
> @@ -450,6 +450,9 @@ nouveau_display_hpd_resume(struct drm_device *dev)
> {
> struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_drm(dev);
>
> + if (drm->headless)
> + return;
> +
> spin_lock_irq(&drm->hpd_lock);
> drm->hpd_pending = ~0;
> spin_unlock_irq(&drm->hpd_lock);
> @@ -635,7 +638,7 @@ nouveau_display_fini(struct drm_device *dev, bool suspend, bool runtime)
> }
> drm_connector_list_iter_end(&conn_iter);
>
> - if (!runtime)
> + if (!runtime && !drm->headless)
>...
2020 Aug 25
22
[RFC v4 00/20] drm/dp, i915, nouveau: Cleanup nouveau HPD and add DP features from i915
Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this
code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers.
Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while.
Other then the occasional runtime PM related and MST related fixes,
we're missing a lot of nice things that have been added to DRM since
this was originally written. Additionally, the code
2020 Aug 20
22
[RFC v2 00/20] drm/dp, i915, nouveau: Cleanup nouveau HPD and add DP features from i915
To start off: this patch series is less work to review then it looks -
most (but not all) of the nouveau related work has already been reviewed
elsewhere. Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this
code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers.
Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while.
Other then the occasional runtime PM
2020 Aug 26
23
[PATCH v5 00/20] drm/dp, i915, nouveau: Cleanup nouveau HPD and add DP features from i915
Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this
code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers.
Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while.
Other then the occasional runtime PM related and MST related fixes,
we're missing a lot of nice things that have been added to DRM since
this was originally written. Additionally, the code
2020 Aug 11
29
[RFC 00/20] drm/dp, i915, nouveau: Cleanup nouveau HPD and add DP features from i915
To start off: this patch series is less work to review then it looks -
most (but not all) of the nouveau related work has already been reviewed
elsewhere. Most of the reason I'm asking for an RFC here is because this
code pulls a lot of code out of i915 and into shared DP helpers.
Anyway-nouveau's HPD related code has been collecting dust for a while.
Other then the occasional runtime PM