search for: hp_next

Displaying 15 results from an estimated 15 matches for "hp_next".

Did you mean: up_next
2018 Feb 28
0
[PATCH] lib: Don't abort if a signal handler calls exit(2) during a guestfs_* function.
...void do_close (guestfs_h *g, int ignore_recursive); gl_lock_define_initialized (static, handles_lock); static guestfs_h *handles = NULL; @@ -323,15 +324,7 @@ guestfs_impl_parse_environment_list (guestfs_h *g, char * const *strings) void guestfs_close (guestfs_h *g) { - struct hv_param *hp, *hp_next; guestfs_h **gg; - int r; - - if (g->state == NO_HANDLE) { - /* Not safe to call ANY callbacks here, so ... */ - fprintf (stderr, _("guestfs_close: called twice on the same handle\n")); - return; - } /* Remove the handle from the handles list. */ if (g->close_...
2015 Jun 06
0
[PATCH 2/5] threads: Acquire and release the lock around each public guestfs_* API.
...ck_count; +#endif /**** Configuration of the handle. ****/ bool verbose; /* Debugging. */ diff --git a/src/handle.c b/src/handle.c index a057475..dfb8817 100644 --- a/src/handle.c +++ b/src/handle.c @@ -316,6 +316,7 @@ guestfs_close (guestfs_h *g) { struct hv_param *hp, *hp_next; guestfs_h **gg; + int r; if (g->state == NO_HANDLE) { /* Not safe to call ANY callbacks here, so ... */ @@ -392,7 +393,24 @@ guestfs_close (guestfs_h *g) free (g->backend_data); guestfs_int_free_string_list (g->backend_settings); free (g->append); - gl_recursive...
2018 Mar 01
7
[PATCH v3 0/6] v2v: Add -o rhv-upload output mode.
v2 -> v3: - Lots of code cleanups. - Documentation. However this is still spooling the file into a temporary before the upload. It turns out that fixing this is going to require a small change to qemu. Rich.
2015 Jun 16
5
[PATCH threads v2 0/5] Add support for thread-safe handle.
Previous discussion here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2015-June/thread.html#00048 v2: - Use a cleanup handler to release the lock. - Rebase to upstream. Note I have not fixed the problem(s) with error handling (patch 3).
2017 Jun 27
9
[PATCH v3 0/5] threads: Add support for thread-safe handle.
Previously posted in 2015: v1: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2015-June/msg00048.html v2: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2015-June/msg00118.html I have rebased and tidied up the patches, fixing a few spelling mistakes, but they are broadly the same as before. I also ran all the tests, which pass. As with the previous versions, this makes a change to the API, where you
2015 Jun 06
7
[PATCH 0/5] Add support for thread-safe handle.
This patch isn't ready to go upstream. In fact, I think we might do a quick 1.30 release soon, and save this patch, and also the extensive changes proposed for the test suite[1], to after 1.30. Currently it is not safe to use the same handle from multiple threads, unless you implement your own mutexes. See: http://libguestfs.org/guestfs.3.html#multiple-handles-and-multiple-threads These
2017 Jul 21
6
[PATCH v3 REPOST 0/5] threads: Add support for thread-safe handle.
Previously posted in 2015: v1: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2015-June/msg00048.html v2: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2015-June/msg00118.html This series was posted about 4 weeks ago: v3: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00287.html There is no change in this series except I rebased it against current upstream head and retested. Last time there
2015 Feb 14
2
[PATCH 0/2] Change guestfs__*
libguestfs has used double and triple underscores in identifiers. These aren't valid for global names in C++. (http://stackoverflow.com/a/228797) These large but completely mechanical patches change the illegal identifiers to legal ones. Rich.
2017 Jul 21
10
[PATCH v10 00/10] Reimplement inspection in the daemon.
v9 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00139.html This depends on these three series (the first two being single minor patches): https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00207.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00209.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00215.html There is no substantive change. I
2017 Jul 17
12
[PATCH v9 00/11] Reimplement inspection in the daemon.
This depends on the patch series "[PATCH 00/27] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml." (https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00098.html) v8 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00274.html v9: - I split up the mega-patch into a more reviewable series of smaller, incremental patches. There are some other changes vs v8, but
2017 Aug 09
16
[PATCH v12 00/11] Reimplement inspection in the daemon.
This fixes almost everything. Note that it adds an extra commit which fixes the whole utf8/iconv business. It's probably better to list what isn't fixed: (1) I didn't leave the osinfo code around because I'm still haven't looked too closely at virt-builder-repository. Can't we just fetch this code from the git history when we need it? (2) I didn't change the way
2017 Jul 31
16
[PATCH v11 00/10] Reimplement inspection in the daemon.
v10: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00245.html No actual change here, but I rebased and retested. Also this series now does not depend on any other patch series since everything else needed is upstream. Rich.
2017 Jun 19
29
[PATCH v7 00/29] Reimplement inspection in the daemon.
v6 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00103.html and this requires the utilities refactoring posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html Inspection is now complete[*], although not very well tested. I'm intending to compare the output of many guests using old & new virt-inspector to see if I can find any
2017 Jun 15
45
[PATCH v6 00/41] Refactor utilities, reimplement inspection in the daemon.
v5: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00065.html Since v5, this now implements inspection almost completely for Linux and Windows guests. Rich.
2017 Jun 21
45
[PATCH v8 00/42] Refactor utilities and reimplement inspection.
v7 was: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00184.html I believe this addresses all comments received so far. Also it now passes a test where I compared about 100 disk images processed with old and new virt-inspector binaries. The output is identical in all cases except one which is caused by a bug in blkid