search for: howcom

...later it is clear that Windows -really- wants to use kerberos keytype 23, a. k. a. "arcfour-hmac-md5", which that particular version of MIT kerberos won't digest. My doubt right now concerns a statement that this "arcfour-hmac-md5" choice applies already in AD2000 -- so howcome it works? (A) The 2k AD supports other types as well and makes peace with MIT krb5 whereas 2k3 AD has been lambasted out of such fraternizing habits, (B) The 2k3 AD would support other types after the proper Magic Handwaving, i. e., tweaking of some well chosen registry keys. Do...

...-power high-performance appliance. A NAS will > work fine for storage, but it's not going to act as a DC etc. [At least > none that I'm aware of and would trust.] > > Even appliances sorta like this, that I've seen, are easily five times the > price. > > -Greg > Howcome no one has though of this before?? What is the "Samba equivalent", as the Alix 2D3 is for SOHO routers?? There's a market gap right there... Or maybe I am the one who thinks this way? Still, thanks for your advice! You are right, so far Optiplexes or similar pretty much fulfill all...

...ore , vous aurez le choix parmi plus de 2 millions de chansons, 25000 podcasts, 1000 clips vid?os. T?l?chargez-les sur votre Mac ou votre PC, puis synchronisez-les sur votre iPod. Autonomie jusque 20 heures. Ecran TFT 320 x 240 pixels. Dim. 10,3 x 6,1 x 1,4 cm. - I don't understand howcome the 6th results is not in first position. Indeed, here is a part of my scriptindex configuration : name: weight=5 unhtml index index=S field=caption description: weight=1 unhtml index field=sample that means *name* should be considered 5 times more relevant than *description*, isn't it ? May...

...h that netdev. >> >> > bypass_master_list is a list of 'struct bypass_master' that associates >> >> Well, can't you have it in netdev priv? >> > >> >We cannot do this for 2-netdev model as there is no bypass_netdev created. >> >> Howcome? You have no master? I don't understand.. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > 'bypass_netdev' with 'bypass_ops' and gets added via bypass_master_register(). >> >> > We need 'ops' only to...

...h that netdev. >> >> > bypass_master_list is a list of 'struct bypass_master' that associates >> >> Well, can't you have it in netdev priv? >> > >> >We cannot do this for 2-netdev model as there is no bypass_netdev created. >> >> Howcome? You have no master? I don't understand.. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > 'bypass_netdev' with 'bypass_ops' and gets added via bypass_master_register(). >> >> > We need 'ops' only to...

...igh-performance appliance. A NAS will >> work fine for storage, but it's not going to act as a DC etc. [At least >> none that I'm aware of and would trust.] >> >> Even appliances sorta like this, that I've seen, are easily five times the >> price. > > Howcome no one has though of this before?? What is the "Samba equivalent", > as the Alix 2D3 is for SOHO routers?? There's a market gap right there... Tbh, you might get away with using PCEngines' APU boards (the successor to their Alix boards with a massively upgraded CPU) if indivi...

...; work fine for storage, but it's not going to act as a DC etc. [At least > > none that I'm aware of and would trust.] > > > > Even appliances sorta like this, that I've seen, are easily five times > the > > price. > > > > -Greg > > > > Howcome no one has though of this before?? What is the "Samba equivalent", > as the Alix 2D3 is for SOHO routers?? There's a market gap right there... > Or maybe I am the one who thinks this way? > > Still, thanks for your advice! You are right, so far Optiplexes or similar >...

* is being hosted on location A and on location B, connected to A through a 64kbps ADSL connection,I have two SIP clients. Shouldn?t the RTP stream between the two endpoints in location B be direct, without going through * on location A? Are there any instances in which the RTP stream always goes through *? (codec translation, maybe?) Please advise. I would like to host a box with * for several

HI all. I was wondering... Isn't it a good thing to store the IP of the client making the call ? Or does asterisk store that in some other place ? /Mike

...$ sudo lsof | grep 62052357 rsync 4532 root 0u unix 0xe68aa040 0t0 62052357 socket rsync 4532 root 1u unix 0xe68aa040 0t0 62052357 socket $ grep 62052357 /proc/net/unix e68aa040: 00000003 00000000 00000000 0001 03 62052357 So it's the same process. Is it hung on itself? Howcome it doesn't respond to timeout and just goes over again? Is it waiting for a signal? Can I send it one and unstick it? There don't appear to be any other fds of interest in the select loop so I'm not sure what other event it could be waiting on besides a signal. It has been hung over...

...ync: readlink "/home/username/mnt/dev" failed: Operation timed out (60) 2008/08/06 01:34:57 [23001] IO error encountered -- skipping file deletion The manpage says that using the exclude option, will prevent it from traversing beneith an exclude-path. Since I exclude /home/username/mnt, howcome it times out on /home/username/mnt/dev? Is there a solution? Other than lazy-unmounting the NFS filesystem? -- Rob klein Gunnewiek BWSS B.V. Deventer (http://www.bwss.nl) Tel +(31) 0570-665140 Fax +(31) 0570-665141

...gt;> with that netdev. >>>>>> bypass_master_list is a list of 'struct bypass_master' that associates >>>>> Well, can't you have it in netdev priv? >>>> We cannot do this for 2-netdev model as there is no bypass_netdev created. >>> Howcome? You have no master? I don't understand.. For 2-netdev model, the master netdev is not a new one created by the bypass module. It is created by netvsc internally and passed via bypass_master_register() <snip> >>> >>>>>>>> + >>>>>>&g...

Hello, Does dovecot require mysql in order to work? Fedora rpms are claiming mysql dependencies. I'm sure you're aware of the long-lived arguement of postgresql v. mysql. If it wasn't your intention to force this, then please snarl at Red Hat. If it was your intention, then grrrrr! Thanks for this product. I like it for it's speed and stability. Jim Edwards

Hi team! At work I have several small branch offices with ~5 PCs each. All PCs are member of a Samba4 domain, whose DCs are on the headquarters (linked by consumer grade VPNs) I want to ship "some small, cheap, reliable and magical device" to each branch, in order to provide just 2 things: * AD replication * File shares That't it, period. Nothing fancy. Suggestions??? What do you

...netdev as well as the ops associated >> > with that netdev. >> > bypass_master_list is a list of 'struct bypass_master' that associates >> Well, can't you have it in netdev priv? > >We cannot do this for 2-netdev model as there is no bypass_netdev created. Howcome? You have no master? I don't understand.. > >> >> >> > 'bypass_netdev' with 'bypass_ops' and gets added via bypass_master_register(). >> > We need 'ops' only to support the 2 netdev model of netvsc. ops will be >> > NULL fo...

...netdev as well as the ops associated >> > with that netdev. >> > bypass_master_list is a list of 'struct bypass_master' that associates >> Well, can't you have it in netdev priv? > >We cannot do this for 2-netdev model as there is no bypass_netdev created. Howcome? You have no master? I don't understand.. > >> >> >> > 'bypass_netdev' with 'bypass_ops' and gets added via bypass_master_register(). >> > We need 'ops' only to support the 2 netdev model of netvsc. ops will be >> > NULL fo...

...d > >> > with that netdev. > >> > bypass_master_list is a list of 'struct bypass_master' that associates > >> Well, can't you have it in netdev priv? > > > >We cannot do this for 2-netdev model as there is no bypass_netdev created. > > Howcome? You have no master? I don't understand.. > > > > > > >> > >> > >> > 'bypass_netdev' with 'bypass_ops' and gets added via bypass_master_register(). > >> > We need 'ops' only to support the 2 netdev model of n...

Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:13:52PM CEST, sridhar.samudrala at intel.com wrote: >On 4/11/2018 8:51 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 08:59:48PM CEST, sridhar.samudrala at intel.com wrote: >> > This provides a generic interface for paravirtual drivers to listen >> > for netdev register/unregister/link change events from pci ethernet >> > devices with the

Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:13:52PM CEST, sridhar.samudrala at intel.com wrote: >On 4/11/2018 8:51 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 08:59:48PM CEST, sridhar.samudrala at intel.com wrote: >> > This provides a generic interface for paravirtual drivers to listen >> > for netdev register/unregister/link change events from pci ethernet >> > devices with the