Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "houseofn".
Did you mean:
houseman
2020 Apr 08
0
autorid broken in samba 4.9?
Sorry, this probably belongs on samba, not -technical, at least for now.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 1:55 PM Nathaniel W. Turner <nate at houseofnate.net>
wrote:
> I have a configuration that is working correctly with samba 4.8 (in CentOS
> 7.6). When I apply the same basic configuration to a system running samba
> 4.9 (CentOS 7.7), I see a very strange behavior: The ID mapping for trusted
> domains does not work right.
>
&...
2020 Jun 17
0
autorid broken in samba 4.9?
...uot; of the services does
not fix it, presumably because the autorid.cache file already has an entry
for this username.
Anyway, I just wanted to post this here in case anyone else finds this
thread while debugging the same problem.
n
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 9:35 AM Nathaniel W. Turner <nate at houseofnate.net>
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for the replies.
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 3:54 AM L.P.H. van Belle via samba <
> samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
>> Good morning Rowland,
>>
>> > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>> > Van: samba [m...
2020 Apr 09
3
autorid broken in samba 4.9?
...ia samba
> Verzonden: woensdag 8 april 2020 20:57
> Aan: sambalist
> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] autorid broken in samba 4.9?
>
> Sorry, this probably belongs on samba, not -technical, at
> least for now.
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 1:55 PM Nathaniel W. Turner
> <nate at houseofnate.net>
> wrote:
>
> > I have a configuration that is working correctly with samba
> 4.8 (in CentOS
> > 7.6). When I apply the same basic configuration to a system
> running samba
> > 4.9 (CentOS 7.7), I see a very strange behavior: The ID
> mapping for trust...
2020 Apr 09
2
autorid broken in samba 4.9?
Hi all,
Thanks for the replies.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 3:54 AM L.P.H. van Belle via samba <
samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Good morning Rowland,
>
> > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens
> > Rowland penny via samba
> > Verzonden: donderdag 9 april 2020 9:46
> > Aan: samba at
2019 Nov 20
4
Why is smbd looking for Kerberos principal cifs/host@DOMB when it is a member of DOMA?
Your config looks ok, as far i can tell.
This : "cifs/kvm7246-vm022.maas.local at TC84.LOCAL"
As it should spn/hostname.fqdn at REALM nothing wrong with that.
But if i understand it right.
Your server : kvm7246-vm022.maas.local is in REALM : TC83.LOCAL ( NTDOM:TC83 )
But you get TC84 back?.
On the problem server run the following:
dig a kvm7246-vm022.maas.local @IP_of_AD-DC
2019 Nov 15
0
Why is smbd looking for Kerberos principal cifs/host@DOMB when it is a member of DOMA?
I?m trying to understand a weird authentication failure:
I have two domains (TC83.LOCAL and TC84.LOCAL), each in a diferent forest,
with a bidirectional forest trust.
The samba server kvm7246-vm022.maas.local is a domain member of TC83 and is
running a recent build from git master (f38077ea5ee).
When I test authentication of users in each domain by running ntlm_auth on
the samba server, it is
2020 Jun 17
0
autorid broken in samba 4.9?
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 9:53 AM Rowland penny via samba <
samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> On 17/06/2020 14:25, Nathaniel W. Turner via samba wrote:
> > I realize I never followed up with this. The problem here turned out to
> be
> > that I was doing a "reload" of the samba services (smb, nmb, winbind) to
> > pick up my ID mapping changes in smb.conf.
2019 Nov 20
0
Why is smbd looking for Kerberos principal cifs/host@DOMB when it is a member of DOMA?
Hi Louis,
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 3:27 AM L.P.H. van Belle via samba <
samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Your config looks ok, as far i can tell.
>
> This : "cifs/kvm7246-vm022.maas.local at TC84.LOCAL"
> As it should spn/hostname.fqdn at REALM nothing wrong with that.
>
> But if i understand it right.
>
> Your server : kvm7246-vm022.maas.local is in