search for: hostility

Hi. Is it still considered risky to use the QEMU guest agent in an untrusted guest? A warning on these lines was written in the manual a few years back when the feature made its debut. I wanted to know if it was hardened since.

...way jack leads (I'm in the UK) but none the less I get: Description Alarms IRQ bpviol CRC4 Fra Codi Options LBO Wildcard X100P Board 1 RED 0 0 0 CAS Unk YEL 0 db (CSU)/0-133 feet (DSX-1) Is this likely to be bad hardware (hostility towards this cheap card noted) or software/driver? It would be just ace to crack this problem and learn some more. Thanks Bob.

On 11/17/2014 12:55 AM, Didier Spaier wrote: > > So one more question: why can one boot with a GRUB EFI bootloader > but not with the SYSLINUX bootloader, using the same kernel? > > More accurately, I know why: because of the aforementioned patch, but > then, why is this test needed in SYSLINUX only? > Because Grub boots the kernel in a "hostile" way (not using

I'm trying to put together a poster using the LaTeX a0poster package and including some things from pstricks to get gradient shading, etc. The problem is that the default environments used by Sweave don't work where I need them. A simple code chunk like <<eval=FALSE>>= x <- 1 @ buried in a minipage within a psshadowbox gives the error Runaway argument? > x <- 1

Are the platforms with no function calls the same ones that have optimization-hostile barrier instructions? If the two sets of platforms are disjoint, OpenCL implementers can use my or Devang's noinline-function technique on the optimization-hostile platforms, and inject a unique argument into the barrier() call in the frontend on the no-function platforms. On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 3:34 AM, Mon

http://blog.regehr.org/archives/761 Thanks, John

On Jul 26, 2012, at 9:58 AM, John Regehr wrote: > http://blog.regehr.org/archives/761 It's an interesting post, but I'd like to point out that it is a non-goal for the project to be actively hostile to users of the compiler. :) It is useful to have debugging tools for people who really care, but "exploiting" undefined behavior just for the sake of breaking code is a

On 02/05/18 09:53, Michelle Kline wrote: > Hi Bert, > > That was distinctly unhelpful Not if you actually follow Bert's advice. > and your outward hostility to a field you > obviously don't understand reveals a regrettable level of ignorance. I didn't see any hostility to any field. Bert, like many of us, objects to people blithely and arrogantly applying possibly deep statistical techniques of which they apparently have little understan...

...s about clang not supporting optimizations > that Linux kernel is used to. > As a side note: x86 maintainers deliberately broke clang support in upstream > (https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/2/115) Yeah, elements of the Linux community seem actively hostile to Clang. We shouldn't let their hostility dictate our technical policy. > I hope that I have made the case for not using address spaces. You've certainly argued against them. You haven't provided adequate semantics for IR without them though. Cheers. Tim.

On 18/11/2014 18:55, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 11/17/2014 12:55 AM, Didier Spaier wrote: >> So one more question: why can one boot with a GRUB EFI bootloader >> but not with the SYSLINUX bootloader, using the same kernel? >> >> More accurately, I know why: because of the aforementioned patch, but >> then, why is this test needed in SYSLINUX only? >> >

On onsdag 29 augusti 2018 kl. 17:39:18 EEST Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 at 10:25, Dag Nygren <dag at newtech.fi> wrote: > > Anyone here with an experience in transitioning QEMU -> XEN ? > http://www.cse.psu.edu/~pdm12/cse544/slides/cse544-schiffman-vTPM.pdf goes > through some of the problems. Yes, I had a look at that earlier and it seems XEN has

On 11/18/2014 10:20 AM, Didier Spaier wrote: > > On 18/11/2014 18:55, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> On 11/17/2014 12:55 AM, Didier Spaier wrote: >>> So one more question: why can one boot with a GRUB EFI bootloader >>> but not with the SYSLINUX bootloader, using the same kernel? >>> >>> More accurately, I know why: because of the aforementioned patch,

Yes, this is the case. The platforms I'm thinking of don't support function calls and have the optimization-hostile barrier instructions. -- Mon Ping On Oct 9, 2009, at 10:46 AM, Jeffrey Yasskin wrote: > Are the platforms with no function calls the same ones that have > optimization-hostile barrier instructions? If the two sets of > platforms are disjoint, OpenCL

Hi, Assume you are in hostile environment, as in you can't trust the DHCP serversss nor the TFTP/HTTP server. So you would want a checksum on kernel and initrd. Which checksum algoritme is available in pxelinux.0? Which checksum algoritme could be integrate into pxelinux.0? In other words: Please advice what could be done to verify what pxelinux.0 did download. Cheers Geert Stappers --

Hi, I'm looking for a good network device that does bandwidth management. It can be integrated in a router or stand-alone, but must be SIP-friendly. I`ve tried the DIR-655 (latest firmware is SIP-hostile, and the latest hardware revisions can't downgrade to the version that worked well) and the DI-724GU (SIP-friendly, but bandwidth management is automated and not configurable

I''m trying to use new_equipment_path, which creates the appropriate link. But, when trying to evaluate "equipment/new" I get the error below. I''ve included my routes (rake route). Equipment is one of those words that pluralizes to "equipment", so the singular is right (from what I know from this forum. Any help would be appreciated. Error: equipment_url

...eemed that the people writing the talk had come up with a way it could be done. That can be it being done in a way that isn't 3/4 bailing wire and duct tape or it could be that the have a viable set of tools which can be done cleanly and meet various security uses which require knowing what the hostility of the environment is. AKA it may work if you expect no hostile VMs ever to be installed or it may mean it works in a hostile environment where VM A and VM B are owned by different actors and they are actively spying on each other. Each of those has different requirements and outcomes. AKA in one y...

...eed to address and the cost/benefit ratio of this > issue is very low. > > In any case, we will get more discussion on this on Sunday, so let's hold our > breath until then... Agreed. I'll volunteer to do the work but I won't bother if the result is likely to be met with hostility :). I'd rather we all agree on a plan, which might include doing nothing. If the plan is acceptable then I don't mind "making it so". Reid -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189...

>Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2014 09:12:19 -0500 >From: Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> >To: Ady <ady-sf at hotmail.com> >Subject: Re: [syslinux] syslinux 6.03 does not boot some kernels > >On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Ady <ady-sf at hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> It sounds as if syslinux.efi 6.03 is only capable of booting a Linux >> kernel 3.3+ with an

Hi everybody, recently I had to teach a course on Cox model, of which I am not a specialist, to an audience of medical epidemiologists. Not a good idea you might say.. anyway, someone in the audience was very hostile. At some point, he sayed that Cox model was useless, since all you have to do is count who dies and who survives, divide by the sample sizes and compute a relative risk, and if there