search for: host_

On Oct 22, 2007, at 2:08 AM, Dietmar Ebner wrote: > hi, > > i've got some more things to note. first, the issue is not related to > x86_64 being the host machine - it also happens on i686/linux. > > next, i think (one of) the problem(s) is the use of > [HOST_]WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN instead of [HOST_]FLOAT_WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN in > llvm-convert.cpp (see patch below). > > this fixes single precision floating point but breaks double > precision. > for arm-softfloat-linux-gnu, FLOAT_WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN is true while > WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN is false. as fa...

...d the users be accessing their mails then? > > Sami Hello Sami, you did not read my first post. We are talking about a multihost installation where one host does SMTP and LDA, and the other does POP and IMAP (with dovecot). Now we want to use dovecot-lda for the local delivery _on the SMTP host_. So there is no need for open POP or IMAP ports and the corresponding running services. -- Regards, Stephan

Dale Johannesen wrote: > On Oct 22, 2007, at 2:08 AM, Dietmar Ebner wrote: >> next, i think (one of) the problem(s) is the use of >> [HOST_]WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN instead of [HOST_]FLOAT_WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN in >> llvm-convert.cpp (see patch below). >> >> this fixes single precision floating point but breaks double >> precision. >> for arm-softfloat-linux-gnu, FLOAT_WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN is true while >> WORDS_BI...

hi, i've got some more things to note. first, the issue is not related to x86_64 being the host machine - it also happens on i686/linux. next, i think (one of) the problem(s) is the use of [HOST_]WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN instead of [HOST_]FLOAT_WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN in llvm-convert.cpp (see patch below). this fixes single precision floating point but breaks double precision. for arm-softfloat-linux-gnu, FLOAT_WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN is true while WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN is false. as far as i've seen, there...

hi, Dale Johannesen wrote: > On Oct 19, 2007, at 7:23 AM, Dietmar Ebner wrote: >> i'm trying to make some experiments with the ARM backend (llvm 2.1) >> and >> therefore built an arm-softfloat-linux-gnu toolchain on x86_64 linux. >> >> however, the llvm-gcc frontend seems to cause troubles with single >> precision floating point values, i.e., they are

On Oct 22, 2007, at 12:25 PM, Dietmar Ebner wrote: > Dale Johannesen wrote: >> On Oct 22, 2007, at 2:08 AM, Dietmar Ebner wrote: >>> next, i think (one of) the problem(s) is the use of >>> [HOST_]WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN instead of [HOST_]FLOAT_WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN in >>> llvm-convert.cpp (see patch below). >>> >>> this fixes single precision floating point but breaks double >>> precision. >>> for arm-softfloat-linux-gnu, FLOAT_WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN is true while...

On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 12:24:25 +0200 Oliver Werner via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi Louis, > > i have checked my /var/tmp > > But there is nothing like host_ or other for kerberos inside. > > ls -lisa /var/tmp/ > 2 4 drwxrwxrwt 3 root root 4096 Sep 25 08:39 . > 2 4 drwxr-xr-x 13 root root 4096 Jun 20 2013 .. > 11 16 drwx------ 2 root root 16384 Aug 9 2012 lost+found > > > In /tmp i can see 4 krb5cc files for users...

Hi all, I'd like to use libvirt to control/have access to virtual machines created with VirtualBox _on a Windows host_ (from the Linux guest of the same Windows-hosted VirtualBox). It is for testing purposes only,, so security does not matter much. Is it possible at all? I have some troubles understanding the note in bold at https://libvirt.org/drvvbox.html. Does that mean that one has to have a (running) libvirt d...

...>> >> Sami > > Hello Sami, > > you did not read my first post. We are talking about a multihost installation > where one host does SMTP and LDA, and the other does POP and IMAP (with > dovecot). Now we want to use dovecot-lda for the local delivery _on the SMTP > host_. So there is no need for open POP or IMAP ports and the corresponding > running services. Again that does not answer my question why? Why do you want all the locking problems and multi-access problems that come with setup like that? What is the actual problem that you are trying to solve? Sam...

...rm -f regress/agent.log + rm -f regress/allowed_signers + rm -f regress/authkeys_orig + rm -f regress/command + rm -f regress/data.2 + rm -f regress/done + rm -f regress/expect_* + rm -f regress/host.sk-ssh-ed25519 at openssh.com + rm -f regress/host_* + rm -f regress/revoked_keys + rm -f regress/sigca-key + rm -f regress/sigca-key.pub + rm -f regress/sk-ssh-ed25519 at openssh.com* + rm -f regress/ssh-ed25519* + rm -f regress/ssh_output + rm -f regress/ssh_proxy.bak + rm -f regress/sshd-log-wrapper...

On Fri, 3 Nov 2017 17:53:47 +0200 (EET) Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: > > On November 3, 2017 at 1:50 PM Stephan von Krawczynski > > <skraw.ml at ithnet.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > we have a setup where SMTP/LDA and POP3/IMAP are on different physical > > hosts. They share the mail data via an external storage.

...> > Hello Sami, > > > > you did not read my first post. We are talking about a multihost > > installation where one host does SMTP and LDA, and the other does POP and > > IMAP (with dovecot). Now we want to use dovecot-lda for the local delivery > > _on the SMTP host_. So there is no need for open POP or IMAP ports and the > > corresponding running services. > > Again that does not answer my question why? Why do you want all the locking > problems and multi-access problems that come with setup like that? What is > the actual problem that yo...

...tandard. On this questiosn. >thats the only one kerberos cache file in /tmp right now. >looks like kerberos does not renew the ticket :(? Do you have something like :  ( look in /var/tmp )   These are the tickes generated by the server. -rw-------  1 root  root   488 Sep 27 10:05 host_0 -rw-------  1 proxy proxy 9646 Sep 30 09:05 HTTP_13   obvious my proxy server  ;-)  Can you check? You can have a peak in thes files.  ( on debian jessie this is )   You can try recreating you keytab file and set “may delicate kerberos” on the computer account first. And see what happe...

I am trying to set up a flexible infrastructure for the assembly code. Basically what I want is configure.in determination of basic machine type (intel/compatible, alpha, ppc), then within that (say intel) the code will detect variants like MMX, SSE, and use the right routines. I know how to do the second, but what is a good way to do the first? Linux/Cygwin/Solaris seem to support the MACHTYPE

Hi Louis, i have checked my /var/tmp But there is nothing like host_ or other for kerberos inside. ls -lisa /var/tmp/ 2 4 drwxrwxrwt 3 root root 4096 Sep 25 08:39 . 2 4 drwxr-xr-x 13 root root 4096 Jun 20 2013 .. 11 16 drwx------ 2 root root 16384 Aug 9 2012 lost+found In /tmp i can see 4 krb5cc files for users there has used kerberos on this member....

Stan, Thanks for the reply. In our case we have actually already done most of the work you suggested to no avail. We had rebuilt two new ntp servers that sync against two stratum 1 sources, and all our nfs clients, regardless of using dovecot, sync to those two machines. You bring up the difference between bare metal and hypervisor, and we are running these machines on vmware 4.0. All the

...ise drsException("DRS connection to %s failed: %s" % (server, e)) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- root at ry11citdc:~# bash /home/pi/Ry11/samba-setup-checkup.sh /home/pi/Ry11/samba-setup-checkup.sh: line 134: HOST_: command not found Check hostnames : Ok Checking detected host ipnumbers from resolv.conf and default gateway Ping gateway ip : 10.44.1.1 : Error Warning, no ping to gateway, this might be firewalled. check you internet connection, AD DNS might need it. ping nameserver1: 10.44.1.10 : Ok Check ping...

...File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/samba/drs_utils.py", line 83, in sendDsReplicaSync     raise drsException("DsReplicaSync failed %s" % estr) *root at ry11citdc:/home/pi/Ry11# bash samba-setup-checkup.sh* Check hostnames : Mismatch in hostname definitions please check : HOST_NAME_SHORT: ry11citdc HOST_NAME_DOMAIN: HOST_NAME_FQDN: ry11citdc HOST_IP1: 10.44.1.10 HOST_IP2: Only one interface detected HOST_GATEWAY: 10.44.1.1 HOST_PRIMARY_INTERFACE: 10.44.1.1 eth0 HOST_RESOLV_DOMAIN: domain ry11cit.lan HOST_RESOLV_SEARCH: search ry11cit.lan HOST_RESOLV_NAMESERV1: 10.44.1.10...