Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "hookable".
Did you mean:
bootable
2007 Jun 08
1
Problem with new cube and scale with ini
I think I have a slight problem with the new hookable plugins
and the ini plugin.
I haven't looked into it too much, but the plugins use an option to
store their abi version. This value is stored so that when the cube/scale
plugins are updated it will not be changed and things will not work.
Do we need some sort of flag to tell ini not to save...
2009 Oct 23
0
Wine release 1.1.32
...RN in the dialog mode.
riched20: Implement handling of WM_KEYDOWN VK_ESCAPE in the dialog mode.
riched20: Implement handling of WM_KEYDOWN VK_TAB in the dialog mode.
Stefan D?singer (13):
configure: Check for ms_hook_prologue attribute support.
kernel32: Make some functions hookable.
user32: Make some functions hookable.
shell32: Make some functions hookable.
d3d8: Make Direct3DCreate8 hookable.
d3d9: Make some functions hookable.
ddraw: Make directdraw create functions hookable.
dinput: Make the creation functions hookable.
d3d: Make...
2014 Mar 07
0
Wine release 1.7.14
...Drop tests.
hlink: Improve file protocol handling in HlinkParseDisplayName.
dinput8: Create a window that will receive events generated by input tests.
Stefan D?singer (5):
wined3d: surface_load_ds_location can handle WINED3D_LOCATION_DISCARDED.
ole32: Make CoCreateInstance hookable for Steam.
user32: Make SetWindowTextA/W hookable.
d3d9: Make ResetEx and PresentEx hookable.
winmm: Make some joystick functions hookable.
Stefan Leichter (3):
wtsapi32/tests: Add some tests for WTSEnumerateProcessesW.
fltlib: Add a version resource.
comdlg32:...
2016 Jan 13
4
RFC: non-temporal fencing in LLVM IR
...o interact
well with regular accesses, which means that regular loads cannot move
"down" a non-temporal barrier, and regular stores cannot move "up" a
non-temporal barrier.
*Why not just have the compiler add the fences?*
LLVM could do this, either as a per-backend thing or a hookable pass such
as AtomicExpandPass. It seems more natural to ask the programmer to express
intent, just as is done with atomics. In fact, a backend is current free to
ignore !nontemporal on load and store and could therefore generate only
half of what's requested, leading to incorrect code. That wou...
2017 Jan 04
5
RFC: Reconsidering adding gmock to LLVM's unittest utilities
...tions, metadata, whatever)
and can write down one format and write checks against the other format for
tests. This is a wonderful world to live in with tests. I never want LLVM
to *decrease* how much we leverage this.
But we *do* have API interactions that we need to test. We have plugin
APIs, and hookable interfaces, ranging from Clang frontend actions to JIT
listeners. We also have *generic* code in ADT that is all about API
interactions. Most generic code in fact is -- we want it to work for *any*
T that behaves in a certain way, so we need to give it interesting Ts to
test it.
My immediate examp...
2009 Feb 18
0
initramfs-tools 0.93 status report
initramfs-tools git repo:
git clone git://git.debian.org/kernel/initramfs-tools.git
initramfs-tools is an hookable initramfs generator.
It can boot on NFS, LVM2, md, LUKS, dmraid, oldstyle devices, ..
The generated initramfs is generic, but can explicitly be tuned for small.
It is actively deployed in Debian and Ubuntu. It is written in POSIX shell.
It has an "end-user" friendly invocation with update...
2016 Jan 14
2
RFC: non-temporal fencing in LLVM IR
...> means that regular loads cannot move "down" a non-temporal barrier,
> > and regular stores cannot move "up" a non-temporal barrier.
>
> > Why not just have the compiler add the fences?
>
> > LLVM could do this, either as a per-backend thing or a hookable
> > pass
> > such as AtomicExpandPass . It seems more natural to ask the
> > programmer to express intent, just as is done with atomics. In
> > fact,
> > a backend is current free to ignore !nontemporal on load and store
> > and could therefore generate only half...
2016 Jan 13
2
RFC: non-temporal fencing in LLVM IR
...egular loads cannot move
> "down" a non-temporal barrier, and regular stores cannot move "up" a
> non-temporal barrier.
>
>
>
>
>
> *Why not just have the compiler add the fences?*
>
>
>
> LLVM could do this, either as a per-backend thing or a hookable pass such
> as AtomicExpandPass. It seems more natural to ask the programmer to
> express intent, just as is done with atomics. In fact, a backend is current
> free to ignore !nontemporal on load and store and could therefore
> generate only half of what's requested, leading to inco...