search for: hooge

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 37 matches for "hooge".

Did you mean: hoge
2016 Nov 08
3
Indexing failed: 500 Internal Server Error
> Yes, this happens because your SOLR server is reporting 500 Internal > Server Error. Do you mean this is normal behaviour of dovecot? I have the impression it causes dovecot to stop indexing all other mailboxes. -- Willem-Jan de Hoog
2016 Nov 09
2
search body with wildcards
Hi, A question. We are using fts_solr. When searching for content in BODY I noticed that dovecot only supports full words. "BODY calibration" returns results but "BODY calibra" does not. Nor "BODY calibra*". Solr does support searching with wildcards so why is it that dovecot does not? regards, -- Willem-Jan de Hoog
2016 Nov 08
3
Indexing failed: 500 Internal Server Error
Hi, While running doveadm index on a mailbox this gets printed: doveadm(neil): Error: fts_solr: Indexing failed: 500 Internal Server Error doveadm(neil): Panic: file http-client-request.c: line 792 (http_client_request_send_payload): assertion failed: (ret == 0) doveadm(neil): Error: Raw backtrace: /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x88662) [0x7f0a52750662] ->
2016 Nov 10
0
search body with wildcards
On 2016-11-09 09:52, W. de Hoog wrote: > Hi, > > A question. We are using fts_solr. When searching for content in BODY I > noticed that dovecot only supports full words. "BODY calibration" > returns results but "BODY calibra" does not. Nor "BODY calibra*". > > Solr does support searching with wildcards so why is it that dovecot > does not?
2010 Jan 21
2
Oggs/ Speex check sum tool
Hi Is there a tool to verify and fix the checksum in a Speex file. I have seen somewhere a tool like "hoog.." Were can I get it Thanks for your time Saju -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20100120/79e209ad/attachment.htm
2014 Jan 06
1
using OR in doveadm search query
Hi, I am trying to create an OR query but no success yet: $ doveadm search mailbox shared/* OR SUBJECT "a" SUBJECT "b" doveadm(neil): Fatal: Use parenthesis when mixing ANDs and ORs $ doveadm search mailbox shared/* OR \(SUBJECT "a"\) \(SUBJECT "b"\) doveadm(neil): Fatal: Unknown argument (SUBJECT $ doveadm search mailbox shared/* \(OR \(SUBJECT
2013 Dec 14
1
search gives variable/different results
Hi, When I perform a search using doveadm every time it returns different results. For example: $ doveadm search mailbox shared/\* TO stromvers 938ff10527d6be515f5900007b46f991 6 938ff10527d6be515f5900007b46f991 7 938ff10527d6be515f5900007b46f991 8 $ doveadm search mailbox shared/\* TO stromvers 6a8ff10527d6be515f5900007b46f991 1 6a8ff10527d6be515f5900007b46f991 3
2005 Feb 04
3
FIX YOUR AUTO-RESPONDERS!!!
PLEASE CONFIGURE YOUR AUTORESPONSERS TO NOT SEND MESSAGES TO PEOPLE WHO POST IN MAILING LISTS YOU SUBSCRIBE TO. This is an extremely rude thing to allow, and is becoming increasingly common, especially with users of the Asterisk-Users list. Daryl _____ From: s.speckenheuer@posservice.de [mailto:s.speckenheuer@posservice.de] Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 6:41 PM To: Daryl G.
2017 Mar 23
4
[Samba 4.5] Very slow LDAP Queries (almost unusable), performance tunning ?
Are use using zarafaAccount=1 withing the search filters? I use this things like this : (&(objectClass=person)(zarafaAccount=1)(|(mail=%s)(otherMailbox=%s))) Or for groups. (&(objectclass=group)(zarafaAccount=1)(|(mail=%s)(otherMailbox=%s))) That helps a lot. ! If you switch to kopano beware to change the SCHEMA and filters zarafaAccount changed to kopanoAccount Greetz. Louis
2013 Jun 10
1
doveadm index crashes when indexing shared mailboxes
Hi, We store our mail archive in a tree of subfolders. I am trying to speed up text searching on our mail archive but when running "doveadm -D -v index -u neil shared/Exalon/Aandeelhouders" the following output is produced: doveadm(neil): Debug: Loading modules from directory: /usr/lib/dovecot/modules doveadm(neil): Debug: Module loaded:
2016 Nov 14
3
Member server losing smb connection
On 2016-11-14 08:39, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > Is this on a windows 7 or 10 client or both? > Are you useing \\FQ.DN\share or \\hostname\share > Try the FQ.DN, as Microsoft advices. > > And where are the TLS parameters in the below config. > Did you set this up? > > Greetz, > > Louis > >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >> Van:
2016 Nov 08
0
Indexing failed: 500 Internal Server Error
Yes, this happens because your SOLR server is reporting 500 Internal Server Error. Aki On 08.11.2016 10:47, W. de Hoog wrote: > Hi, > > While running doveadm index on a mailbox this gets printed: > > doveadm(neil): Error: fts_solr: Indexing failed: 500 Internal Server > Error > doveadm(neil): Panic: file http-client-request.c: line 792 >
2016 Nov 08
0
Indexing failed: 500 Internal Server Error
Op 11/8/2016 om 10:09 AM schreef W. de Hoog: >> Yes, this happens because your SOLR server is reporting 500 Internal >> Server Error. > Do you mean this is normal behaviour of dovecot? I have the impression > it causes dovecot to stop indexing all other mailboxes. > Fixed. It will take a while until the fix pops up in the master branch. Regards, Stephan.
2018 Sep 23
2
Last_login plugin and mysql
Hello, i have problems configuring the last_login plugin with mysql. I have extended the postfixadmin database with a new field, configured the plugin as described in the wiki. Finally i got errors: table is not writable, INSERT failed. Why is the insert required? The plugin should only UPDATE the column for existing rows. Or am i missing some configuration options? Here is my dictionary
2018 Sep 24
0
Last_login plugin and mysql
On 23.09.2018 19:20, Thomas Hooge wrote: > Hello, > > i have problems configuring the last_login plugin with mysql. > > I have extended the postfixadmin database with a new field, > configured the plugin as described in the wiki. > > Finally i got errors: table is not writable, INSERT failed. > > Why i...
2010 Jan 20
2
Getting speex to build under MinGW / Msys - ./configure failure
Hiya, I'm trying to get speex compiling under windows using MinGW and Msys. Sequence of events: - unpack the speex distribution, then run: - ./configure --disable-shared then it happily goes off and spews out a load of output, untill finally, it spews out the "killer": checking for sin in -lm... yes checking for getopt_long... yes checking for main in -lwinmm... yes ./configure:
2007 Dec 17
1
ggplot-How to define fill colours?
Dear R's (most likely Hadley), I want to build a stacked bar plot where I would like to define which colours will be used for each of the groups. However, I do not seem to find a way to do this, even if I've been looking over many places. I have tried several variations, and my final try was this code, but I still do not manage to get the colours as I pre-define. Any hints about how
2020 Apr 29
0
Latest Ubuntu 16.04 samba upgrade breaks external ldap auth (CVE-2020-10704)
Hai, Well, my advice here is.. Your using Ubuntu 16.04 which is EOL this month. So the best is to upgrade to or 18.04 or goto 20.04. And else i suggest you read : https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2020-10704.html * For authenticated connections the maximum packet size is controlled by the smb.conf parameter "ldap max authenticated request size" * For anonymous connections
2016 Nov 14
2
Member server losing smb connection
I have a member server running Ubuntu 16.10, Samba 4.4.5 that is serving files to W10 and W7 clients. Things appear fine and suddenly the server share disappears and the W clients "cannot see" the server. The client error message is: "The device or resource (member hostname) is nt setup to accept is not setup to accept connections on port "The file and print sharing
2020 Jul 03
3
dns_tkey_gssnegotiate: TKEY is unacceptable
On 7/3/2020 8:58 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > Please do not use '127.0.0.1' as a nameserver, use the DC's ipaddress > instead. I have corrected this as you have suggested. > > You might be looking at the wrong keytab, do you have: > > /var/lib/samba/bind-dns/dns.keytab > > Rowland > Yes, I do (why two dns.keytab . . . a question for later) have