search for: hocs

Hi, I was trying to figure out how to do post-hoc tests for Two Way ANOVAs and found the following 2 approaches: a. Do pairwise t-tests (bonferroni corrected) if one finds significance with the ANOVA. Link- http://rtutorialseries.blogspot.com/2011/01/r-tutorial-series-two-way-anova-with.html b. Do TukeyHSD on an aov model Link-

I remember reading about post hoc statistical power on R-help. But I can't seem to find them with RSiteSearch("post hoc statistical power") and variations of it. I would like to learn more about post hoc statistical power, its meaningfulness, advantages and disadvantages. I thought the issue was settled after Tukey's 1993 paper about post hoc statistical power being

I have R version 2.11.1 I am able to run a Friedman.test, but cant do further post.hoc test. Tried running "friedman.test.with.post.hoc"etc It comes with "Error: object 'friedman.test.with.post.hoc' not found" This is after loading the packages "coin" and "multcomp" Could anyone please send in any suggestions how to ratify? -- View this message

Hi * i've done my anova anlysis but now i need post-hoc test, are these included in R ? I've a Big problem, working with people that don't like to use command-line software (but prefer something like openoffice) does someone is trying to do a usable GUI for R ? i'm reading something on R commander SciView and others but all seem to be beta. I'd like to make possible to make

I'm using lm to run an ANOVA, and would like to use Ryan's Q as my post-hoc (as recommended by Day and Quinn, 1989, Ecological Monographs). I can't seem to find any methods in the base stats package that implement this post-hoc. Is there a good package of post-hoc methods out there, or has someone written a method for Ryan's Q previously? Thanks! -Jarrett

Hi, Does anybody have an idea on how to realise ad-hoc conferencing with Asterisk ? Although Asterisk MeetMe and maybe a procedure with Call Holding could somehow come close to ad-hoc conferencing, it doesn't seem to be the right way to do it. Any experience with ad-hoc conferencing using SIP in general as well as with Asterisk? Thanks, Joerg

Dear R users, I would like to know if there is a way in R to execute a post-hoc test (factor levels comparison, like Tukey for ANOVA) of a non-parametric analysis of variance with kruskal.test() function. I am comparing three different groups. The preliminary analysis using the kruskal-wallis-test show significance, but I still don''t know the relationship and the significance level

Hi there, I've got a small question : is there any post-hoc test for Kruskal rank sum test integrated in R ? I know that the Nemenyi test is one of the post-hoc that can be used, but there's no (to by knowledge) R function for it. What should I do ? Thanks, Etienne

Hi all, I analysed my data with lme and after that I spent a lot of time for mean separation of treatments (post hoc). But still I couldn’t make through it. This is my data set and R scripts I tried. replication fertilizer variety plot height 1 level1 var1 1504 52 1 level1 var3 1506 59 1 level1 var4 1509 54 1 level1 var2 1510 48 2 level1 var1 2604 47 2 level1 var4 2606 51 2 level1 var3

Hi all, I'm a potential new user of R and have to know this before I start using it: SPSS does not let you do a Post Hoc analysis on repeated measures data. This is a problem for me, since that is what I will have to do. Will R let me do this? /Fredrik -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Fredrik Karlsson, Research Student Department of Philosophy and

Hi, I have searched and found a response to a question similar to mine but when I tried the code, R says it's not an actual function so I thought I'd ask here. http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/file/n4633035/Cookies.csv Cookies.csv I have attached the data I am using. I am trying to look at two things: how moisture content changes over time, and how it changes along the length of a log

This is only partly an R question, but this seems a good place to ask. Like many, if not most, statistics programs, R has no post hoc tests for Kruskal Wallis or Friedman, and as far as I can make out they are not available in any of the R packages. I would be grateful if someone could point me in the right direction if I am wrong. As I said this is not uncommon. Parametric Anova procedures

Is there code in R to automatically assign letters to different groups that are found to be statistically significant using a post-hoc test following an ANOVA? For example, let's say I found that relative rates of tree growth were statistically significant between tree species using an ANOVA and then I ran a TukeyHSD post-hoc test to determine which species were statistically

Hi R-helpers, TukeyHSD() works for models fitted with aov(), but could anyone point me to a function that performs a similar post hoc test for models fitted with lm() or glm()? Thanks in advance, Mark

Hi Folks, I have been using the TukeyHSD to conduct post hoc comparisons. The challenge is I have two interacting factors, one of which has 6 levels (cover types), and the other 2 (study areas). As a result interpreting the post hoc comparisons is difficult when you get a list of every possible combination (66 of them). In grad school I was using SAS and I recall most of the post hoc tests

Hi, I have a fairly simple repeated measures-type data set I've been attempting to analyze using the lme function in the nlme package. Repeated searches here and other places lead me to believe I have specified my model correctly. However, I am having trouble with post-hoc tests. From what I gather, other people are successfully using the glht function from the multcomp package to

Hi R helpers! I have used a glht as a post-hoc test on an lmer with: -2 treatments (A & B) -1 categorical explanatory variable (song type) -1 response variable (latency to respond) I wanted to make comparisons between the categorical variables depending on treatment. At the moment the glht simply returns comparisons of each of the (3) categorical explanatory variables with each other

Hi list, I would like to know if there is a way in R to execute a post-hoc test (factor levels comparison, like Tukey for ANOVA) of a non-parametric analysis of variance (kruskal.test() function object). I was looking for something like the Dunn Test. I’ve searched the internet but nothing seemed to define a way to it. Do You have any suggestion? Other equivalent test maybe! Thanks in

Hi. I'm analysing some fish biological traits with a gam in mgcv. After several tries, I got this model log(tle) = sexcolor + s(doy, bs = "cc", by = sexcolor) +log(tl) sexcolor is a factor with 4 levels doy is "day of year", which is modeled as a smoother tl is "total length of the fish" The summary of this models is (only parametric coefficientes): Parametric

Hello, I am trying to determine the most appropriate way to run post-hoc comparisons on my lme model. I had originally planned to use Tukey HSD method as I am interested in all possible comparisons between my treatment levels. TukeyHSD, however, does not work with lme. The only other code that I was able to find, and which also seems to be widely used, is glht specified with Tukey: