Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "hmni6ehx0e5rmd".
Did you mean:
hmni6ehx0e5rmdly
2015 Nov 27
1
Test failed!!
...production machine :-(.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ opus mailing list
> opus at xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/opus
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWV6K3AAoJEJ6/8sItn9q9bikIALCjl3JoSE6WzQBeocHhHA5s
hMni6ehX0e5rmDly+jtFSABB4AEkKophiHHYAblVWV+VMuexY6URGiADS1XtfMk8
KujHncHp/KpOsRhBhr07qgUzsTzCmBStVrkgEb8gIhy4aYWgaS1ZrRC/CHwyAMlJ
Iz1NEDEVvWVQYy6nb9R/B699j39YF0+n7n1rQTJDR5OgabD4bZ//Q67lWmNf6C5v
fSwUmydfOzcAy1EJzf8Bsx8lmNDsC/LWRKsTpDXzVnIoyx0N4C5S1Ab8GFiQcafR
OxRFELfOI/jPiisc4JlpDHw+TYOskY6D8rEuGbDvswHvw/I4gQSMS4...
2015 Nov 26
2
Test failed!!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hi Jesus,
Thanks for the report. As far as I can tell, what's happening is that
when intrinsics are enabled, we compile all tests with -msse4.1, even
when it's only run-time detected. In most cases, that doesn't cause
any issue, but sometimes the compiler will take the C code and
generate an SSEx instruction on its own. I think this is