Displaying 20 results from an estimated 189 matches for "hlinked".
Did you mean:
linked
2002 Jan 13
1
rsynd-2.5.1 / hlink.c patches
Platform: Compaq OpenVMS Alpha 7.3
Compiler: Compaq C T6.5
The following patch resolves compile problems with the HLINK.C module.
The cast on function argument for the qsort() routine was wrong, and not
allowing the compile to complete.
When the function definiton of the hlink_compare() is corrected to have
the const qualifiers, the cast inside the qsort() function call is no
longer
2015 Mar 11
0
[Bug 11161] New: rare crash in hlink.c:536
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11161
Bug ID: 11161
Summary: rare crash in hlink.c:536
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.1
Hardware: x64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core
Assignee: wayned at samba.org
Reporter: sbrabec at
2006 Sep 01
0
Add --no-tweak-hlinked, etc.
...ds a destination file that passes
the quick check with the source file but differs in attributes, the
receiving rsync will change the attributes. This is undesirable when
the destination is an incremental backup containing files hard-linked
from older backups.
Thus, I propose an option --no-tweak-hlinked to tell the receiving
rsync not to change the attributes of an existing destination file
with more than one link. Instead, rsync would copy the file and move
the copy over the link to the shared original.
I'm thinking about how best to implement this. I would love to use
copy_file(fname, fna...
2007 Nov 04
1
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4561] Add options --tweak, --no-tweak, --no-tweak-hlinked
...been fixed, the
implementation is pretty simple; Wayne, perhaps you guessed from the comment
change I inadvertently left in my patch for bug 5051 that this was what I was
up to.
The options seem to work and itemize properly, and there is even a test case.
The clever interaction between --no-tweak-hlinked and --inplace is not
implemented, but it can come later (if at all). Please add some form of this
to patches/ . I will start using --no-tweak-hlinked in my sync_first-mode
rsnapshot runs.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this ma...
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5407] New: hlink.c:480: finish_hard_link: Assertion `flist != ((void *)0)' failed.
2008 Apr 22
4
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5407] New: hlink.c:480: finish_hard_link: Assertion `flist != ((void *)0)' failed.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5407
Summary: hlink.c:480: finish_hard_link: Assertion `flist !=
((void *)0)' failed.
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.2
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo:
2008 Aug 07
1
rsync: hlink.c:271: check_prior: Assertion `node->data != ((void *)0)' failed.
BLS #rsync --version
rsync version 3.0.4pre2 protocol version 30
Copyright (C) 1996-2008 by Andrew Tridgell, Wayne Davison, and others.
Web site: http://rsync.samba.org/
Capabilities:
64-bit files, 64-bit inums, 32-bit timestamps, 64-bit long ints,
socketpairs, hardlinks, symlinks, IPv6, batchfiles, inplace,
append, ACLs, xattrs, iconv, symtimes
rsync comes with ABSOLUTELY NO
2009 Jul 08
3
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6542] New: rsync: hlink.c:125: match_gnums: Assertion `gnum >= hlink_flist->ndx_start' failed.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6542
Summary: rsync: hlink.c:125: match_gnums: Assertion `gnum >=
hlink_flist->ndx_start' failed.
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.6
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
2008 Feb 07
0
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4561] Add options --tweak, --no-tweak, --no-tweak-hlinked
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4561
matt@mattmccutchen.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
------- Comment #3 from matt@mattmccutchen.net 2008-02-06 21:33
2008 Jul 26
0
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4561] Add options --tweak, --no-tweak, --no-tweak-hlinked
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4561
wayned@samba.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|WONTFIX |
Version|3.0.0 |3.1.0
------- Comment #9 from
2008 Apr 26
1
Bug#477931: rsync: Segfaults syncing the linux kernel archive.
Hi Wayne,
I just got this bug report about rsync 3.0.2 reproducibly crashing,
together with a backtrace and a patch; very helpful :-)
(Please preserve 477931-forwarded@bugs.debian.org in the CC so that you
response is archived in the Debian BTS, thanks.)
Paul Slootman
On Fri 25 Apr 2008, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Subject: Bug#477931: rsync: Segfaults syncing the linux kernel archive.
> From:
2008 May 08
3
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4561] Add options --tweak, --no-tweak, --no-tweak-hlinked
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4561
------- Comment #5 from sites-samba@carlthompson.net 2008-05-07 20:19 CST -------
See bug #5448.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
2015 Sep 09
2
large rsync fails with assertion error
rsyncing a tree of perhaps 30M files, getting this:
rsync: hlink.c:126: match_gnums: Assertion `gnum >= hlink_flist->ndx_start' failed.
then a bit more output and
2008 Mar 26
1
rsync 3.0.1pre -H fails assertion
Wayne,
I have this bug in redhat bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439074
Summary: rsync 3.0.1pre -H fails assertion
Is it ok to pass this kind of bug directly upstream filing a new bug in
bugzilla and linking the fedora bug ?
(There is also a reproducer there)
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
2008 Sep 23
2
(not quite) reproducible segfaults in 3.0.3
In debian bug #498083 (http://bugs.debian.org/498083) someone is getting
segfaults reasonably consistently, however when using -vvvv it doesn't
happen...
Fortunately Sven was able to get a good backtrace. I can't quite see
what's causing the problem; it does seem to be related to xattrs.
Please see the bugs report at the url above for the details.
Any help much appreciated.
Paul
2013 Mar 29
1
Wine release 1.5.27
The Wine development release 1.5.27 is now available.
What's new in this release (see below for details):
- System tray support in the Mac driver.
- Various C runtime improvements.
- Large icons for built-in applications.
- Various bug fixes.
The source is available from the following locations:
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/wine/wine-1.5.27.tar.bz2
2012 Jun 24
7
Hlink node data for 2282618 already has path=...
So, like a lot of people, I am using --link-dest to do backups. My
backup target is ext4 so with a hard link limit of 64K. I do end up
with trying to create too many links at some point though and get the
following sequence of events:
rsync: link "/.snapshots/hourly.0/linux/usr/src/openwrt-r18617/build_dir/host/mpfr-2.4.1/tests/.deps/tui_sub.Po" =>
2007 Nov 12
1
rsync 3.0.0 pre5 + hard link preversation trigger assert
I've setup rsync 3.0.0 pre5 on distrib-coffee.ipsl.jussieu.fr (rsync server)
and upload the same into mandriva cooker (development distribution).
Someone reported this failure:
rsync -auvPH --delete
--exclude-from="/home/rfox/exclude.txt"
distrib-coffee.ipsl.jussieu.fr::mandrivalinux/devel/cooker/i586/ .
receiving incremental file list
rsync: hlink.c:253: check_prior: Assertion
2008 Feb 08
0
Wine release 0.9.55
This is release 0.9.55 of Wine, a free implementation of Windows on Unix.
What's new in this release:
- Direct3D improvements, including driver version emulation.
- Beginnings of support for OLE objects in Richedit.
- Several fixes to the animation control.
- A bunch of fixes for regression test failures.
- Lots of bug fixes.
Because of lags created by using mirrors, this message
2012 Jun 05
2
[Bug 8979] New: rsync daemon: High load while skipping hardlinks
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8979
Summary: rsync daemon: High load while skipping hardlinks
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.5
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
ReportedBy: simon.klinkert at
2003 Dec 30
3
The dangers of static buffers in rsync code
I have been trying for quite a while now to understand why is the
flist.c:f_name() function implemented using static buffers. Anyone care to
comment?
The immediate problem is that any call to f_name overrides the previous
content (well, obvious). This, combined with the fact that several
function calls are made with the result of f_name(file) results in
problems handling hardlinks - and