search for: hiyuh

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10547 --- Comment #6 from Maarten Maathuis <madman2003 at gmail.com> 2008-02-01 11:16:02 PST --- I've not heard people complain about this recently, is it still an issue? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

...work/llvm-9999/Release/bin/llc: > error auto-selecting target for module 'No available targets are > compatible with this triple, see -version for the available targets.'. >  Please use the -march option to explicitly pick a target. ...Takumi as chapuni 2012/4/4 KIMURA Masaru <hiyuh.root at gmail.com>: > Hi, > > CodeGen/Generic/dbg-declare.ll is really generic test? > > $ make check > llvm[0]: Running test suite > make[1]: Entering directory > `/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/llvm-9999/work/llvm-9999/test' > Making a new site.exp file... > Makin...

...: >> error auto-selecting target for module 'No available targets are >> compatible with this triple, see -version for the available targets.'. >>  Please use the -march option to explicitly pick a target. > > ...Takumi as chapuni > > 2012/4/4 KIMURA Masaru <hiyuh.root at gmail.com>: >> Hi, >> >> CodeGen/Generic/dbg-declare.ll is really generic test? >> >> $ make check >> llvm[0]: Running test suite >> make[1]: Entering directory >> `/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/llvm-9999/work/llvm-9999/test' >> Maki...

Hi, CodeGen/Generic/dbg-declare.ll is really generic test? $ make check llvm[0]: Running test suite make[1]: Entering directory `/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/llvm-9999/work/llvm-9999/test' Making a new site.exp file... Making LLVM 'lit.site.cfg' file... Making LLVM unittest 'lit.site.cfg' file... ( ulimit -t 600 ; ulimit -d 512000 ; ulimit -m 512000 ; ulimit -v 1024000 ; \

Hi, Can anyone fix this TEXTREL bug in ToT? https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=403519 Thanks,

Hi, > The patch in PR is wrong since it will make both darwin and windows > unhappy. I will comment on gentoo PR about possible proper solution. I'll give it a try as you comment on the gentoo PR. But my ppc box is in my office, so I'll post a result on next Monday (JST). Thanks,

Hi, >> The patch in PR is wrong since it will make both darwin and windows >> unhappy. I will comment on gentoo PR about possible proper solution. > > I'll give it a try as you comment on the gentoo PR. > But my ppc box is in my office, so I'll post a result on next Monday (JST). I posted my result on the gentoo PR. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=403519#c12

Hi, > You need to declare function like > > extern "C" { > static void* LLVM_ATTRIBUTE_USED > PPCCompilationCallbackC > <everything else goes here> > }; revised patch is filed and it works fine. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=403519#c16 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=403519#c17 so now this revised patch can be merged into ToT? Thanks,