Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "hivex__visit_nod".
Did you mean:
hivex__visit_node
2011 Apr 13
1
[PATCH hivex] maint: split long lines
...0x%zx, data len %zu, block len %zu)\n",
data_offset, len, blen);
len = blen - 4;
}
@@ -1502,7 +1527,9 @@ hivex_visit (hive_h *h, const struct hivex_visitor *visitor, size_t len,
return hivex_visit_node (h, hivex_root (h), visitor, len, opaque, flags);
}
-static int hivex__visit_node (hive_h *h, hive_node_h node, const struct hivex_visitor *vtor, char *unvisited, void *opaque, int flags);
+static int hivex__visit_node (hive_h *h, hive_node_h node,
+ const struct hivex_visitor *vtor,
+ char *unvisited, void *opaque, int flags);
int
hivex_visit_node (hive_h *h...
2011 Aug 10
1
[PATCH] Report last-modified time of hive root and nodes
...rr, "hivex_node_mtime: ret: %s\n", ret);
+ }
+ if (ft_rc) {
+ free(ret);
+ ret = NULL;
+ }
+ return ret;
+}
+
#if 0
/* I think the documentation for the sk and classname fields in the nk
* record is wrong, or else the offset field is in the wrong place.
@@ -1560,6 +1593,7 @@ hivex__visit_node (hive_h *h, hive_node_h node,
{
int skip_bad = flags & HIVEX_VISIT_SKIP_BAD;
char *name = NULL;
+ char *last_modified = NULL;
hive_value_h *values = NULL;
hive_node_h *children = NULL;
char *key = NULL;
@@ -1584,8 +1618,11 @@ hivex__visit_node (hive_h *h, hive_node_h node,...
2011 Aug 10
1
[Hivex][PATCH v2] Report last-modified time of hive root and nodes
...rr, "hivex_node_mtime: ret: %s\n", ret);
+ }
+ if (ft_rc) {
+ free(ret);
+ ret = NULL;
+ }
+ return ret;
+}
+
#if 0
/* I think the documentation for the sk and classname fields in the nk
* record is wrong, or else the offset field is in the wrong place.
@@ -1560,6 +1633,7 @@ hivex__visit_node (hive_h *h, hive_node_h node,
{
int skip_bad = flags & HIVEX_VISIT_SKIP_BAD;
char *name = NULL;
+ char *last_modified = NULL;
hive_value_h *values = NULL;
hive_node_h *children = NULL;
char *key = NULL;
@@ -1584,10 +1658,24 @@ hivex__visit_node (hive_h *h, hive_node_h node,...
2013 Jul 25
19
[PATCH hivex 00/19] Fix read/write handling of li-records.
This is, hopefully, a full fix for handling of li-records.
See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717583
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987463
Rich.
2011 Sep 17
3
[PATCH 1/1] hivexml: Base64-encode non-printable data
Some of the data in names and string values were being unsafely printed,
causing some types of XML processors to fail (e.g. Python's Expat).
This patch checks for printability of each character and outputs base64
with an encoding attribute for unsafe data.
---
xml/hivexml.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)