Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "hit_next".
2012 Feb 16
3
[PATCH 1/4] Btrfs: be less strict on finding next node in clear_extent_bit
...ed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index fcf77e1..e941cc4 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -577,8 +577,7 @@ hit_next:
if (start <= end && next_node) {
state = rb_entry(next_node, struct extent_state,
rb_node);
- if (state->start == start)
- goto hit_next;
+ goto hit_next;
}
goto search_again;
--
1.6.5.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bt...
2011 Aug 15
9
[patch v2 0/9] btrfs: More error handling patches
Hi all -
The following 9 patches add more error handling to the btrfs code:
- Add btrfs_panic
- Catch locking failures in {set,clear}_extent_bit
- Push up set_extent_bit errors to callers
- Push up lock_extent errors to callers
- Push up clear_extent_bit errors to callers
- Push up unlock_extent errors to callers
- Make pin_down_extent return void
- Push up btrfs_pin_extent errors to
2011 Oct 04
68
[patch 00/65] Error handling patchset v3
Hi all -
Here''s my current error handling patchset, against 3.1-rc8. Almost all of
this patchset is preparing for actual error handling. Before we start in
on that work, I''m trying to reduce the surface we need to worry about. It
turns out that there is a ton of code that returns an error code but never
actually reports an error.
The patchset has grown to 65 patches. 46 of them